The prominence of Russian-made helicopters in Bashar
al-Assad’s brutal and desperate efforts to hang on to power puts the
Syrian war in a new light. It’s getting difficult to categorize the
conflict simply as a humanitarian crisis or a “teacup war” of secondary
significance. Rather, Syria’s civil war is increasingly fought under a
great-power cloud that hasn’t been seen in the Middle East for decades.
An anti-Assad fighter aims at a helicopter.
NEWSCOM
Most of Washington would rather ignore the darkening forecast. In one of his periodic Washington Post
op-eds, Henry Kissinger warned that a “Syrian intervention risks
upsetting [the] global order.” While Kissinger went on to acknowledge
that the fall of Assad’s regime would suit the national interests of the
United States in both humanitarian and strategic terms, he concluded
that an armed intervention would fail to meet his two tests for U.S.
involvement. First, there was no consensus on what kind of regime would
replace Assad’s. Second, there was no assurance that the “political
objective”—call it “victory”—could be achieved “in a domestically
sustainable time period.”
In short, Kissinger spoke in the voice of regretful
realism. From this perspective, the Syrian civil war is an unfortunate
event, a human catastrophe, a strategic opportunity to remove a regime
that’s been a longtime pest, but, if it requires a serious and enduring
American commitment, not a reason to upset the international order.
This appears to reflect the thinking of the Obama
administration. The president said last August that the time had come
for Assad “to step aside,” but has yet to do anything to force the
issue.
The problem with this sort of realism is that it isn’t
really realistic, insofar as it fails to appreciate the balance of
power. If Assad stays, the global order will be very much affected, and
one of the most significant features of the post-Cold War order will be
threatened. In particular, the United States’ ability to push for
fundamental political change in the greater Middle East with a free hand
will be severely curtailed. The Syrian crisis then is a big deal, not
only in the region, but also in global terms.
The Saturday Profile
Greek Mayor Aims to Show Athens How It’s Done
Eirini Vourloumis for The New York Times
By SUZANNE DALEY
YIANNIS BOUTARIS campaigned for mayor here in 2010, promising to shake
up the bureaucracy. He did not think that this sprawling metropolis on
the Aegean Sea — Greece’s second-largest city — really needed 5,000
employees. It could make do with 3,000.
But getting there turned out not to be so easy.
“I can’t fire anyone,” he said recently, leaning back in his favorite
stuffed chair and inhaling deeply on a cigarette. “The law doesn’t allow
it.”
Instead, Mr. Boutaris, a wiry 70-year-old with a gold stud in one ear, a
buzz cut and a penchant for expletives, is trying something previously
unheard of at this City Hall: employees are given job descriptions,
goals, evaluations — and modest bonuses when they hit their targets.
In voting for Mr. Boutaris, the residents of Thessaloniki did what many
experts predict the country will do when voters go to the polls on
Sunday. They chose an outsider, someone who did not belong to the two
mainstream parties that have led this country for nearly three decades,
someone who held out the possibility of a new beginning.
Surveys suggest a tight race between Alexis Tsipras,
the leader of the upstart and left-leaning Syriza coalition, and
Antonis Samaras, who heads the center-right New Democracy, one of the
two mainstream parties.
But no matter who wins the national election, few believe that Greece can go on without a major overhaul
of its government. In Thessaloniki, Mr. Boutaris has been trying to do
that on a local scale for 18 months, bringing his experience as a
businessman to bear on the bloated work force, the tangled regulations
and the huge debt that afflicts the city, much as it does the country.
Many of his efforts have prompted city workers to strike and protest.
But he is undeterred. Nor does he have any patience for the shop owners
who have ignored his efforts to clean up the look of this gracious but
somewhat shabby city by enforcing rules about modest signage.
“There was one guy who said to me he wants Thessaloniki to be like Hong
Kong,” Mr. Boutaris said with a shake of his head and an expletive.
“Well, I said, ‘I don’t want to be like Hong Kong. You think your
business will be destroyed because you don’t have a sign on the fifth
floor? I don’t think so.’ ”
Thessaloniki was about $126 million in debt when Mr. Boutaris, a
successful winemaker, was sworn into office. (His predecessor has since
been indicted, along with 17 others. They are accused of stealing almost
$38 million.) The city was doing a poor job of delivering basic
services, most importantly in garbage collection. It was losing
manufacturing jobs to Bulgaria. And as far as Mr. Boutaris was
concerned, Thessaloniki was far from meeting its potential as a tourist
attraction and a port city that offers easy access to the Balkans. READ MORE
Russia Announces It Will Send Warships to Syria
June 17, 2012
On Friday, the Russian General Staff announced it will send warships from the Black Sea Fleet to the Syrian coast. The deployment will protect the Russian logistics base in Tartus, Syria.
The Syrian port at Tartus.
Russia has historically maintained a strong bilateral relationship
with Syria. Its only Mediterranean naval base for the Black Sea Fleet is
located in the port of Tartus.“Several warships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, including large landing ships with marines aboard, are fully prepared to go on the voyage,” the General Staff told Itar-Tass.
In late May, Russian and Western media reported that the Russian-flagged bulk cargo vessel Professor Katsman docked at the Syrian port of Tartus and delivered weapons to the al-Assad regime. The Ford Foundation funded NGO Human Rights First also made the claim. Amnesty International, a Soros funded NGO, has called on the Russian government to cease the transfer of arms to Syria in compliance with UN Security Council recommendations.
“Either the U.S. intelligence service works poorly or they have a poor knowledge of geography,” a source with the Russian General Staff remarked in response to the allegation.
On Sunday, The Telegraph reported that the United States has enlisted the help British officials to stop an alleged shipment of MI25 helicopters from the Russian Baltic port of Kaliningrad. The MV Alaed, a Russian-operated cargo vessel, is said to be sailing across the North Sea en route to Syria. The U.S. wants the ship’s insurance cover removed under the terms of a European Union arms embargo against Syria. Removing the MV Alaed’s insurance would make it difficult for the cargo ship to dock in port.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.N. ambassador Susan Rice used the claim to accuse Russia of arming the al-Assad regime.
“The new Russian weapons supplies add to Syria’s massive arsenal of hundreds of Soviet-built combat jets, attack helicopters and missiles and thousands of tanks, other armored vehicles and artillery systems,” the AP reported after Clinton’s accusation that Russia had sent attack helicopters to Syria. “Russia said it also has military advisers in Syria training the Syrians to use the Russian weapons, and has helped repair and maintain Syrian weapons. Some experts alleged that the helicopters Clinton said were en route to Syria could be old ones that underwent maintenance in Russia.”
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has denied the accusation. In a statement on June 15, he said that “many years ago” Russia sold helicopters to Syria, but is now only repairing the helicopters.
Former Clinton bureaucrat and United Nations ambassador Bill Richardson used the accusation to call for arming Syrian rebels “in an effort to protect civilians against government forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad,” according to Fox News.
The Free Syrian Army now active inside Syria is supported by the CIA, MI6 and Mossad. The rebel group held talks with the NSC last week in an effort to acquire heavy weapons, including surface-to-air missiles. According to witnesses and other evidence, the FSA is responsible for the massacre in al-Houla, Syria, not the al-Assad regime as was widely reported by the media in the United States and Europe.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario