Democrats in Desperation! Why?

The Distraction Defense: Democrats, Media Desperate to Change the Subject

---

by Joel B. Pollak 20 Aug 2012

 

The surest sign that Democrats know they are in trouble after Paul Ryan's nomination to the Republican presidential ticket behind Mitt Romney is the desperation with which they are trying, desperately, to steer the conversation away from the economy, entitlements, and the Constitution--with the help of the media, of course. This is the substantive debate that President Barack Obama always said he was ready for, and which the media always calls for in high-minded tones, but once it is here they are suddenly trying to change the conversation.

The latest distraction is a side show in the Missouri race for U.S. Senate, where Republican nominee Todd Akin attempted to defend his opposition to abortion and made the ridiculous statement that the female body has a way to prevent conception in cases of "legitimate rape." He later retracted, as he ought to have done. There is room for diversity in the GOP of views on the moral aspects of abortion; there's no room for disagreement on the questions of whether rape is ever welcome or how babies are made. Read More



Invest in BANCO SOCIAL... $5K at 6ms ...10% !!!

Niall Ferguson: Obama’s Gotta Go

Aug 19, 2012 1:00 AM EDT

Why does Paul Ryan scare the president so much? Because Obama has broken his promises, and it’s clear that the GOP ticket’s path to prosperity is our only hope.

I was a good loser four years ago. “In the grand scheme of history,” I wrote the day after Barack Obama’s election as president, “four decades is not an especially long time. Yet in that brief period America has gone from the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. to the apotheosis of Barack Obama. You would not be human if you failed to acknowledge this as a cause for great rejoicing.”

Despite having been—full disclosure—an adviser to John McCain, I acknowledged his opponent’s remarkable qualities: his soaring oratory, his cool, hard-to-ruffle temperament, and his near faultless campaign organization.

Yet the question confronting the country nearly four years later is not who was the better candidate four years ago. It is whether the winner has delivered on his promises. And the sad truth is that he has not.

In his inaugural address, Obama promised “not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth.” He promised to “build the roads and bridges, the electric grids, and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together.” He promised to “restore science to its rightful place and wield technology’s wonders to raise health care’s quality and lower its cost.” And he promised to “transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age.” Unfortunately the president’s scorecard on every single one of those bold pledges is pitiful. READ MORE

Wayuu Laptop Sleeve

NECESITA AYUDA ECONOMICA TEMPORAL?.... AET del Banco Social

 

Lo mejor de la semana · 13 – 19 de agosto de 2012

Miryam Lindberg

En la sección Lo mejor de la semana destacamos todo lo destacable acaecido durante estos días para que Ud. le eche un vistazo a los tópicos de actualidad sin perderse el análisis profundo de importantes temas READ MORE.

DREAM: Hay que resolver los retos de la inmigración

Jessica Zuckerman
El día 15 de agosto entró en vigor la normativa de la administración Obama de acción diferida para los denominados “soñadores” (DREAMers) , es decir, personas que entraron el país siendo menores de edad y que se hallan en situación ilegal

Gran Bretaña tiene razón: No al asilo para Assange

Dr. Ray Walser
A primera hora del día 16 de agosto, el ministro de Exteriores de Ecuador, Ricardo Patiño, anunció que su país le concede asilo político al fundador de WikiLeaks Julian Assange, eso sí, si puede llegar hasta Ecuador.

La nueva diplomacia pública: Hay que conocernos bien primero

Helle Dale
¿Cuál es el mensaje que Estados Unidos está tratando de transmitir y cómo lo conectamos con una buena normativa que sea coherente con los ideales americanos y aumente la seguridad nacional?

La energía eólica y los subsidios

Amy Payne
El analista de la Fundación Heritage Nicolas Loris ha expuesto las razones por las que el crédito fiscal para la producción de energía eólica tiene tanto sentido como un crédito fiscal para la producción de cintas VHS.

El gobierno se apropiará de casi la mitad de su sueldo en 2013

Patrick Tyrrel
¿Cuán alta es la tasa marginal del impuesto sobre los ingresos para cada dólar que gana el americano promedio? En otras palabras, ¿si Ud. tuviera un aumento de sueldo de un dólar, cuánto de ese dólar se iría en impuestos? Por desgracia, estas tasas ya son altas y van a sufrir una subida el próximo año.

Obama edita documentos del Departamento de Estado para hacerse propaganda

Amy Payne
El analista de la Fundación Heritage Jim Roberts, uno de los redactores del Índice de Libertad Económica, se reveló apabullado por el desproporcionado cambio en el énfasis de los textos mientras realizaba recientemente una investigación. Roberts, que trabajó en el Departamento de Estado desde 1982 hasta 2007 y solía escribir estos perfiles sobre países, comentó que nunca había visto unas redacciones como esas con ninguna de las anteriores administraciones, ya fueran republicanas o demócratas.

El Gráfico de la Semana: Déficits presupuestarios vs. Exportaciones

Bryan Riley
Si a los políticos verdaderamente les interesa que haya un aumento de las exportaciones de Estados Unidos, su principal prioridad debería ser la contención del gasto federal excesivo. Esto reduciría el déficit presupuestario, lo que a su vez resultaría en un menor número de bonos del Tesoro “exportados”.


Wayuu iPhone Case

Russia and Obama....Just words?

Obama Fiddles . . .

While Russia arms Assad.

 By THOMAS DONNELLY

       

The prominence of Russian-made helicopters in Bashar al-Assad’s brutal and desperate efforts to hang on to power puts the Syrian war in a new light. It’s getting difficult to categorize the conflict simply as a humanitarian crisis or a “teacup war” of secondary significance. Rather, Syria’s civil war is increasingly fought under a great-power cloud that hasn’t been seen in the Middle East for decades.

An anti-Assad fighter aims at a helicopter.

NEWSCOM

Most of Washington would rather ignore the darkening forecast. In one of his periodic Washington Post op-eds, Henry Kissinger warned that a “Syrian intervention risks upsetting [the] global order.” While Kissinger went on to acknowledge that the fall of Assad’s regime would suit the national interests of the United States in both humanitarian and strategic terms, he concluded that an armed intervention would fail to meet his two tests for U.S. involvement. First, there was no consensus on what kind of regime would replace Assad’s. Second, there was no assurance that the “political objective”—call it “victory”—could be achieved “in a domestically sustainable time period.” 

In short, Kissinger spoke in the voice of regretful realism. From this perspective, the Syrian civil war is an unfortunate event, a human catastrophe, a strategic opportunity to remove a regime that’s been a longtime pest, but, if it requires a serious and enduring American commitment, not a reason to upset the international order. 

This appears to reflect the thinking of the Obama administration. The president said last August that the time had come for Assad “to step aside,” but has yet to do anything to force the issue.

The problem with this sort of realism is that it isn’t really realistic, insofar as it fails to appreciate the balance of power. If Assad stays, the global order will be very much affected, and one of the most significant features of the post-Cold War order will be threatened. In particular, the United States’ ability to push for fundamental political change in the greater Middle East with a free hand will be severely curtailed. The Syrian crisis then is a big deal, not only in the region, but also in global terms.

The Saturday Profile

Greek Mayor Aims to Show Athens How It’s Done

Eirini Vourloumis for The New York Times

"When you propose the slightest change, people say no. If you do it all at once, it is a different thing. Something has to break through." YIANNIS BOUTARIS

By SUZANNE DALEY

YIANNIS BOUTARIS campaigned for mayor here in 2010, promising to shake up the bureaucracy. He did not think that this sprawling metropolis on the Aegean Sea — Greece’s second-largest city — really needed 5,000 employees. It could make do with 3,000.

But getting there turned out not to be so easy.

“I can’t fire anyone,” he said recently, leaning back in his favorite stuffed chair and inhaling deeply on a cigarette. “The law doesn’t allow it.”

Instead, Mr. Boutaris, a wiry 70-year-old with a gold stud in one ear, a buzz cut and a penchant for expletives, is trying something previously unheard of at this City Hall: employees are given job descriptions, goals, evaluations — and modest bonuses when they hit their targets.

In voting for Mr. Boutaris, the residents of Thessaloniki did what many experts predict the country will do when voters go to the polls on Sunday. They chose an outsider, someone who did not belong to the two mainstream parties that have led this country for nearly three decades, someone who held out the possibility of a new beginning.

Surveys suggest a tight race between Alexis Tsipras, the leader of the upstart and left-leaning Syriza coalition, and Antonis Samaras, who heads the center-right New Democracy, one of the two mainstream parties.

But no matter who wins the national election, few believe that Greece can go on without a major overhaul of its government. In Thessaloniki, Mr. Boutaris has been trying to do that on a local scale for 18 months, bringing his experience as a businessman to bear on the bloated work force, the tangled regulations and the huge debt that afflicts the city, much as it does the country.

Many of his efforts have prompted city workers to strike and protest. But he is undeterred. Nor does he have any patience for the shop owners who have ignored his efforts to clean up the look of this gracious but somewhat shabby city by enforcing rules about modest signage.

“There was one guy who said to me he wants Thessaloniki to be like Hong Kong,” Mr. Boutaris said with a shake of his head and an expletive. “Well, I said, ‘I don’t want to be like Hong Kong. You think your business will be destroyed because you don’t have a sign on the fifth floor? I don’t think so.’ ”

Thessaloniki was about $126 million in debt when Mr. Boutaris, a successful winemaker, was sworn into office. (His predecessor has since been indicted, along with 17 others. They are accused of stealing almost $38 million.) The city was doing a poor job of delivering basic services, most importantly in garbage collection. It was losing manufacturing jobs to Bulgaria. And as far as Mr. Boutaris was concerned, Thessaloniki was far from meeting its potential as a tourist attraction and a port city that offers easy access to the Balkans. READ MORE

Reach OUT to the HISPANIC MARKET...we organize your business trip!

Earthy Watch

Russia Announces It Will Send Warships to Syria

Kurt Nimmo
June 17, 2012

On Friday, the Russian General Staff announced it will send warships from the Black Sea Fleet to the Syrian coast. The deployment will protect the Russian logistics base in Tartus, Syria.

The Syrian port at Tartus.

Russia has historically maintained a strong bilateral relationship with Syria. Its only Mediterranean naval base for the Black Sea Fleet is located in the port of Tartus.
“Several warships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, including large landing ships with marines aboard, are fully prepared to go on the voyage,” the General Staff told Itar-Tass.
In late May, Russian and Western media reported that the Russian-flagged bulk cargo vessel Professor Katsman docked at the Syrian port of Tartus and delivered weapons to the al-Assad regime. The Ford Foundation funded NGO Human Rights First also made the claim. Amnesty International, a Soros funded NGO, has called on the Russian government to cease the transfer of arms to Syria in compliance with UN Security Council recommendations.
“Either the U.S. intelligence service works poorly or they have a poor knowledge of geography,” a source with the Russian General Staff remarked in response to the allegation.
On Sunday, The Telegraph reported that the United States has enlisted the help British officials to stop an alleged shipment of MI25 helicopters from the Russian Baltic port of Kaliningrad. The MV Alaed, a Russian-operated cargo vessel, is said to be sailing across the North Sea en route to Syria. The U.S. wants the ship’s insurance cover removed under the terms of a European Union arms embargo against Syria. Removing the MV Alaed’s insurance would make it difficult for the cargo ship to dock in port.

In April, a German cargo ship was prevented from docking at Tartus. The ship allegedly carried a cargo of munitions sent by Iran to the al-Assad regime.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.N. ambassador Susan Rice used the claim to accuse Russia of arming the al-Assad regime.
“The new Russian weapons supplies add to Syria’s massive arsenal of hundreds of Soviet-built combat jets, attack helicopters and missiles and thousands of tanks, other armored vehicles and artillery systems,” the AP reported after Clinton’s accusation that Russia had sent attack helicopters to Syria. “Russia said it also has military advisers in Syria training the Syrians to use the Russian weapons, and has helped repair and maintain Syrian weapons. Some experts alleged that the helicopters Clinton said were en route to Syria could be old ones that underwent maintenance in Russia.”
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has denied the accusation. In a statement on June 15, he said that “many years ago” Russia sold helicopters to Syria, but is now only repairing the helicopters.
Former Clinton bureaucrat and United Nations ambassador Bill Richardson used the accusation to call for arming Syrian rebels “in an effort to protect civilians against government forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad,” according to Fox News.
The Free Syrian Army now active inside Syria is supported by the CIA, MI6 and Mossad. The rebel group held talks with the NSC last week in an effort to acquire heavy weapons, including surface-to-air missiles. According to witnesses and other evidence, the FSA is responsible for the massacre in al-Houla, Syria, not the al-Assad regime as was widely reported by the media in the United States and Europe.