martes, 9 de diciembre de 2014

Death. Riots. Suffering. What is happening?...Pobreza = Desigualdad?...How will Facebook survive in a Communist country?

Featured Image
My heart is heavy wondering, “How do these communities and the rest of our nation find peace in the midst of so much angst?

Death. Riots. Suffering. Where is the peace on Earth this Christmas?

A woman I just met tells me her husband lost his job and she recently quit hers to stay home with her children. Their life is unsettled. How does she find peace?
A text came through late at night last week as a man shared that his daughter is going to lose her baby at 23 weeks. I wake in the morning to see pictures of her stillborn child. How does this family find peace in the pain of this loss?
I read a news announcement online: “Violence Flares in St. Louis Suburb After Grand Jury Declines to Indict Darren Wilson in Michael Brown’s Death.” I watch as the community in Ferguson, Missouri is divided and more tragedies begin to unfold as fallout of the decision.
A few days later, I see another online news announcement that read: “Grand Jury Declines to Indict NYPD Officer in Eric Garner Chokehold Death.” People are outraged by the news and many take to the streets in protest.
My heart is heavy wondering, “How do these communities and the rest of our nation find peace in the midst of so much angst?"
Christmas is approaching and I see signs saying “peace on earth.” I put one up in my own house. Peace. How does the heart find peace?
Last night, as I met with the adult leaders in the girls’ program I direct, Lesley who is in her early 20’s shared with me details from her service trip to Peru. Lesley has a condition called alopecia, which caused her to lose all her hair many years ago. And, in this culture where she constantly hears messages of the importance of looks, she has found confidence and comfort in who she is and who God created her to be.
She went to Peru without her wig. People stared and pointed, and because she did not speak the language, she could not tell people about why she is bald. She felt a slight discomfort in their looks, but she wasn’t there to defend her appearance; she was there to serve.  She surrendered her desires and dug deeper to humble herself in pure sacrifice for the people she was tending to. 
Follow Melanie on Facebook 
Lesley told me not only about the physical poverty of the people she encountered, but she also their spiritual poverty. “It was difficult and even uncomfortable being in a place so far from home knowing there was so much that needed to be done to help these people, but there was so little time,” she said. Then she shared a sentence that struck me. “I had to find peace in the discomfort.” She added, “I wasn’t there to solve these people’s problems, I had no control over that.” She went on to quote Mother Teresa, “God does not require that we be successful only that we be faithful.” She adds, “I tried to be faithful and pushed back my inclination to be successful.”
How do we find peace in a world that seems at times peace-less? We recognize, like Lesley, what we can do and what we cannot. We surrender control. And, as the old-age-serenity-prayer goes, we pray, “God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.”
We can find peace in faithfulness to the Lord. We can find peace in He who is peace. Peace who was found in the uncomfortable setting of a manger where he was laid in a trough where animals were usually fed. We can find peace in the discomfort. We can find peace when we love as He loved; when we trust as He trusted; when we sacrifice as He sacrificed.
Saint John Paul II once said, “Man cannot fully find himself, except through a sincere gift of himself.” Maybe we find peace not in fixing every problem we see or shooting for success in everything we do, but in simply offering ourselves as a sincere gift to others.
Image
Recently the picture above became, as many are calling it, an “Icon of Hope.” Twelve-year-old Devonte Hart, an African-American boy, held up a sign that read “Free Hugs” during a Ferguson-related rally in Portland, Oregon. A white police officer took Hart up on his offer and the picture captured this tender moment of the two hugging and tears running down Hart’s face.
Devonte Hart made a sincere gift of himself in that moment when he decided to create a sign that read “Free Hugs.” He gave the gift of himself and offered peace in the discomfort. Hart can’t fix the enormous problems happening in this country, but he did bring something big right into the heart of that storm. He brought peace. And, because it was photographed, he has now brought that peace, courage, strength, and hope to many who were feeling discouraged.
If we could all be more like Devonte Hart. If we could all surrender our desire to fix, solve and be successful and replace it with a willingness to be faithful and find peace and bring peace in even the most uncomfortable places. May each of us, as Christmas approaches, not think about the presents we will get or the toys and trinkets we will give, but see our own potential as gift. May we become gift as Christ himself was to all and give the sincerity of ourselves to those who least expect it. It is there we will find peace.
 Original Wayuu Bags

Pobreza y desigualdad

OxfamOxfam es un buen ejemplo de pensamiento único, porque combina un análisis superficial con una fuerte carga moralizante. Véase este párrafo de un reciente informe:
La fortuna de las 85 personas más ricas del mundo es equivalente a la de la mitad más pobre del planeta. La brecha entre ricos y pobres se ha disparado estos últimos años. Es una amenaza para reducir la pobreza pero también para construir sociedades más cohesionadas, democráticas y justas. Es hora de cambiar unas reglas del juego que ahora están diseñadas a favor de unos pocos. Es hora de que hablemos de desigualdad.
La principal deficiencia analítica es la sugerencia de que desigualdad y pobreza están relacionadas. No se trata sólo de que hay personas muy ricas sino que su riqueza es comparada con la de quienes no son acaudalados, como si ambos fenómenos estuviesen relacionados, cuando no tienen por qué guardar entre sí vinculación alguna, salvo que se demuestre realmente lo que este párrafo sugiere, es decir: que los ricos son tan ricos porque los pobres son tantos y tan pobres.
Dirá usted: qué disparate de planteamiento. Pero es lo que dice Oxfam para cualquiera que lea: se trata de una “brecha”, que “amenaza” la reducción de la pobreza, y nada menos que la democracia y la justicia. Se trata de unas “reglas” pensadas para “unos pocos”. Nada de esto se sostiene, pero se repite sin cesar, igual que sin cesar las jeremiadas contra la desigualdad excluyen la enorme desigualdad que en el último siglo se ha abierto entre la riqueza del Estado y la de sus súbditos.
No abundaré hoy en el informe de Oxfam, ya criticado por Juan Ramón Rallo en Voz Pópuli (puede verse también su análisis sobre el informe de Cáritas en Libertad Digital). Pero me interesa subrayar una de las fuerzas más importantes del pensamiento único: su impacto en el periodismo. La combinación de análisis insuficiente y ostentación moralizante puede tener efectos devastadores si los periodistas que lo recogen carecen de espíritu crítico y, como suele suceder con Oxfam, están dispuestos a aceptar como verdad revelada todas sus argumentaciones.
El modo en el que el diario español El Periódico se hizo eco de dicho informe es ilustrativo de esa actitud acrítica y ditirámbica. Con una llamada en portada que denuncia “España, fábrica de desigualdad”, que ya nos invita a pensar en una siniestra conspiración de algunos que se dedican realmente a fabricar esa cosa tan mala, Agustí Sala llena dos páginas del diario con gran entusiasmo y ni un solo matiz ni cuestionamiento. Los ricos, así, no sólo tienen riqueza sino que la acaparan. El lector sólo puede concluir que es imprescindible una intervención pública mayor para redistribuir y luchar contra la desigualdad. Y todo para bien, sólo para bien en todos los sentidos:
El informe destaca que la desigualdad no es un mal necesario para el progreso, como se sostiene desde algunos ámbitos, sino una traba.
Ni un matiz sobre la lógica aparentemente impecable que fuerza la conclusión de que es imprescindible subir los impuestos. No puede haber objeción alguna, y menos cuando dicha conclusión viene avalada por el peso de la moral. Después de todo, queda claro, como señala un recuadro, que los datos de Oxfam no sólo son indiscutiblemente “ciertos” sino además “lacerantes”.

ZUCKERBERG LAUDS SOCIALISM WITH CHINA’S INTERNET CENSORSHIP CZAR

Facebook CEO's visit with Lu Wei "hypocritical and absurd"
Zuckerberg Lauds Socialism With China's Internet Censorship Czar
by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON DECEMBER 9, 2014

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg lauded the virtues of socialism during a recent meeting with Lu Wei, the czar of China’s draconian Internet censorship system.
Having previously met with State Department official Catherine Novelli, who urged the two countries to “work together as friends” on web security, Wei paid a visit to Facebook’s SIlicon Valley offices despite the fact that the social networking website is completely banned in China.
During the meeting, Wei discovered a book written by Chinese President Xi Jinping called “The Governance of China” sitting on Zuckerberg’s office desk, leading Zuckerberg to comment, “I’ve bought this book for my co-workers. I want them to understand socialism with Chinese characteristics.”
“The sight of Xi’s book on a tech tycoon’s table has been taken as hypocritical and absurd by many observers – the government Xi leads has one of the most restrictive Internet policies in the entire world and Facebook itself is banned in the country. Zuckerberg’s promoting of the book struck many as kow-towing,” reports the Washington Post.
Prominent Chinese dissident Hu Jia accused Zuckerberg of having an understanding of Chinese politics akin to a 3-year-old, while users of China’s social media site Weibo portrayed the Facebook CEO as a Mao-era Red Guard clutching Xi’s book.
Given that Facebook is the second biggest website in the world after Google, the fact that Zuckerberg is palling around with the head of a formidable censorship program that routinely silences and intimidates government critics is disconcerting to say the least, especially amidst efforts by the Obama administration, which has received Facebook support in the past, to reclassify the web as a utility, bringing it under Title II of the Telecommunications Act and greasing the skids for FCC control.
Under Wei’s control, blocks on foreign websites in China have increased, while regulations on social media were tightened to make web users who posted content critical of the state legally responsible for any content which receives over 500 shares should it be deemed a “false rumor” by authorities.
Those who flouted Wei’s order to keep posts about government conduct “positive” had their accounts shut down and some were even detained by police.
China routinely censors the Internet and cuts off access in order to hide evidence of government corruption and to cover up atrocities committed by the state, a process that Wei has personally overseen since 2011.

No hay comentarios.:

Publicar un comentario