Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta climate change. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta climate change. Mostrar todas las entradas

martes, 29 de diciembre de 2015

Obama to destroy middle class, white, Christian America?...El Falso discurso sobre desigualdad!!!...EPA Warning: your Holiday Leftovers cause Climate Change!!!

Zmirak: Obama Wants Refugees To Destroy 'Middle Class, White, Christian America'

John Zmirak, a conservative writer and an editor of James Robison’s The Stream website, said in an interview with former Alaska GOP Senate candidate Joe Miller this week that President Obama wants to accept refugees from the Syrian civil war because he sees Muslims as “tools” to “destroy the middle class, white, Christian America that he has hated since his youth.”
Miller, appalled that the U.S. will still accept refugees after the terrorist attacks in Paris, asked Zmirak, “What’s going on with the administration, why aren’t they recognizing the danger?”
“Because Obama identifies with the Islamic world,” Zmirak responded. “He went to Islamic school, his political sympathies have always been with the so-called victims of colonialism in the Third World, and every one of his policies in foreign policy, as Dinesh D’Souza pointed out, can be explained by an attempt to de-westernize America and to weaken the West and to strengthen the Third World. It’s all in support of his postcolonial, quasi-Marxist agenda.”
“I don’t think Obama is a Muslim,” he clarified. “I don’t think he would be this brazen if he were a Muslim. He would be actually less brazenly pro-Muslim if he were really a Muslim, he’d be a little bit embarrassed. But because he’s an atheist Marxist, he can just see the Muslims as tools to be used to destroy the middle class, white, Christian America that he has hated since his youth.”

FILED UNDER

PEOPLE:

 Wayuu Bags by Carito

El falso discurso de la desigualdad


El discurso sobre el “aumento de la desigualdad” que ha enarbolado el presidente estadounidense Barack Obama esconde una evolución de la distribución salarial que se antoja mucho más positiva de lo que apunta el discurso pesimista del mandatario norteamericano.
La “prueba del algodón” está en los datos de ingreso por hogar que recoge el censo. A partir de esta base de datos, el American Enterprise Institute ha dividido a la población en tres bloques: en el primero están las familias con menos de 50.000 euros de ingresos anuales; en el segundo están los hogares que ganan más de 50.000 y menos de 100.000 euros por ejercicio; en el tercero figuran aquellos casos en los que la renta anual supera los 100.000 euros.
Pero hay más. Como ha explicado Scott Winship, si partimos a la población en cuatro grupos y nos fijamos en el 25% de menor renta, vemos que su ingreso medio creció un 40% en los últimos cuarenta años; siendo aún más exigentes y fijándonos en el 10% de menos ingresos, vemos que su renta media mejoró un 85% durante el mismo periodo.
Finalmente, conviene recordar que quienes están en el tramo de ingresos más bajos no son necesariamente las mismas personas. De hecho, si observamos la evolución de la movilidad, encontramos que EEUU es un país en el que el “ascensor social” sigue funcionando de manera dinámica. Así, la probabilidad de que alguien nacido entre el 20% más pobre se sitúe entre el 20% más rico a lo largo de su vida se ha mantenido constante a lo largo de las últimas décadas.
Pues bien, si ajustamos las cifras del censo para hablar en dólares constantes, vemos que el peso del primer grupo de hogares sobre el total de la población ha caído significativamente. Esto quiere decir que hace cuarenta años, el 58,2% de los hogares ganaba menos de 50.000 euros por ejercicio, mientras que en 2014 este porcentaje se había reducido al 46,8%.
Subiendo un escalón, vemos que el grupo de ingresos de entre 50.000 y 100.000 dólares anuales por hogar ha perdido peso sobre el total de la población, pasando del 33,7% registrado a finales de la década de 1960 al 28,5% que vemos en la actualidad.
Finalmente, si atendemos al grupo de rentas de más de 100.000 euros al año por familia, vemos que dicho colectivo solamente ascendía al 8,1% de la población mientras que en 2014 la cifra registrada fue del 24,7%
Posted in Opinión

EPA Warning: Holiday Leftovers Contribute to Climate Change

By Penny Starr | December 28, 2015 | 10:43 AM EST
(AP photo)
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) posted a video on its website to tell Americans that they should think about how much food they waste during the holiday season if they want to help save the planet.
The video is part of the EPA’s “Fight Food Waste” campaign.
In the video posted on YouTube and in the text accompanying it, EPA claims that food waste contributes to climate change.
“Most people don't realize how much food they throw away every day — from uneaten leftovers to spoiled produce,” the EPA website states. “More than 96% of the food we throw away ends up in landfills.
“Once in landfills, food breaks down to produce methane, a potent greenhouse gas which contributes to climate change,” the text states. “So, this holiday season, take steps to cut down your food waste.”
The video on the EPA website shows a family sitting down for a holiday meal.
“Before sitting down with friends and family this holiday season, consider the impact your meal can have on our planet,” the video, posted on Dec. 16, states.
“A typical American family of four throws out $1,600 of wasted food each year,” it continues.
“It ends up in landfills where it rots and releases methane – a greenhouse gas 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide that contributes to climate change,” the narrator states while an image of a savage storm is shown.
“So this holiday season, buy only what you need,” the video states. “Donate your extra food to food banks and shelters and compost the trimmings.”

viernes, 11 de diciembre de 2015

Obama's Multi-Culturalism as dangerous as Islamic Extremism...Impacto de Obamacare...God vs Climate Change!!!


The Only Thing as Dangerous as Islamic Extremism Is Obama's Extreme Multi-Culturalism


December 10, 2015|7:12 am
U.S. President Barack Obama
U.S. President Barack Obama speaks about counter-terrorism and the United States fight against Islamic State during an address to the nation from the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, December 6, 2015.
Today, we face an enemy that has killed about 60,000 U.S. and allied troops in the past decade — and just last month, killed more than 5,000 innocent civilians.
Yet Sunday night, President Obama assured the American people that Islamic extremism represents only a "tiny fraction of Muslims." And, he argued that his policies, which have allowed this enemy to grow exponentially, will somehow "achieve a more sustainable victory."

image: https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/adview?ai=B_slTiutqVqCwHtbMpgP6zKXQDMijiJsHAAAAEAEgsNnrGjgAWNiJ_JGYAmDJhoCA5KTAE7IBFXd3dy5jaHJpc3RpYW5wb3N0LmNvbboBCWdmcF9pbWFnZcgBCdoBHWh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2hyaXN0aWFucG9zdC5jb20vmAK4F8ACAuACAOoCJC83MjQxL2NocmlzdGlhbnBvc3Qvb3Bpbmlvbi9hcnRpY2xlc_gC9NEekAPoApgDpAOoAwHgBAGQBgGgBiDYBwA&sigh=MvZp5iLJcuU&cid=5GiAkTxMOf9IpaSmIyXzbAyo&adurl=
Julie RoysJulie Roys is host of a national talk show on the Moody Radio Network called "Up For Debate."
Increasingly, this president is showing himself to be completely out of touch with reality. Does anyone besides Bernie Sanders actually believe Obama's claim that gathering to discuss Climate Change last month served as a "powerful rebuke to jihad terrorists"? Certainly, no one in their right mind still believes Obama's assertion that terrorists pose "no specific or credible threat to the United States." Nor, do they believe his delusion that ISIS is "contained."
Americans are not reassured by Obama's dismissive attitude or lectures on Islamophobia; they're terrified by them. Quite frankly, the only thing as scary as radical Islamic terrorists is the leader of the free world denying their expansive reach and influence. This is why Donald Trump is gaining so much support for his extreme immigration stance, despite the fact that it negates the religious freedom conservatives hold dear.
The terrorist threat is not imagined; it is not tiny; and it is absolutely an outgrowth of a particular religious ideology. If Obama would simply recognize this reality and take appropriate action, people would not reactively embrace the opposite extreme. But, President Obama cannot bring himself to recognize this truth because it negates his entire worldview.
Obama's Extreme Multi-Culturalism
What is clear from Obama's speech and actions is that he interprets the world through a thoroughly post-modern, multi-culturalist lens. As Nancy Pearcey writes in Total Truth, multi-culturalists believe that "truth is relative to particular interpretive communities" and "knowledge claims are at best social constructions" and at worst "power plays." In other words, multiculturalists believe truth is nothing more than a convenient fiction that each community — based on gender, race, sexuality or religion — creates to serve its own interests. And, since each community's fiction is equally valid (after all, they're all made up) — trying to impose one community's fiction on another community is simply an attempt to dominate (which is wrong, even though there is no wrong).
For example, when he ran for office in 2008, he said he believed marriage was the union of one man and one woman. Then, due to his views "evolving," he switched and not only embraced gay marriage, but boldly promoted it.Over the past seven-and-a-half years, President Obama's relativistic worldview has become painfully obvious.
Similarly, he was incapable of determining if taking the life on an unborn baby was wrong, saying the question was "above his pay grade." But, he's had no qualms about supporting a women's right to kill her unborn child and has actually funded it.
And now, when faced with radical Islamic terrorism, President Obama seems incapable of naming this nemesis or calling it "evil." Instead, he continues to make apologies for Islam, insisting — despite the evidence— that it is a peaceful religion.
Obama must continue to spin the myth that all religions say basically the same thing and that none could actually be evil — especially one embraced by 1.5 billion people. After all, if a world religion truly perpetuated objective evil, his entire worldview would crumble. So, despite the facts, he perpetuates a myth.
A case in point was last Thursday, at the annual tree lighting ceremony.
There, Obama said, "That's the message of the child whose birth families like mine celebrate on Christmas — a prince born in a stable who taught us that we should love our neighbors as ourselves ... These are the lessons of Jesus Christ. But they're also the bedrock values of all faiths."
Unfortunately, though, it's not just President Obama who's promoting this myth. Recently, a pastor I know posted a video of Iranian-American writer, Reza Aslan, to Facebook, calling his analysis "spot on." In the video, Aslan asserts that "Islam doesn't promote violence or peace. Islam is just a religion. And, like every religion in the world, it's what you bring to it. If you're a violent person, your Islam, your Judaism, your Christianity, your Hinduism is going to be violent."
So apparently, even to a Christian pastor, all religions are basically equal. And, Islam isn't inherently violent; some people are just inherently violent. And, for some strange reason, a large proportion of them live in Muslim countries.
This is sheer lunacy. Christians aren't suicide bombers because we don't believe in jihad. Ideas matter — and religious ideas, because they tell us who we are and why we're here — matter most of all.
The Truth About Islam
Though it's true that many Muslims practice their faith in a peaceful way, the message Muhammad taught is incredibly violent and imperialistic. In the Quran 2:191-193, it says, "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out." Similarly, Quaran 8:12 reads, "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"
Many will argue that the Old Testament has equally violent texts. However, the violent texts in the Old Testament are constrained to a very specific historical context — the ancient Israelite conquest of Canaan. However, these verses in the Quran are open-ended and believed by many Muslims to be as relevant today as they were when they were first penned.
This is why so-called radicalized Muslims are not a "tiny minority." According to a 2015 Pew Poll, 63 million Muslims support ISIS in the 11 countries polled. Now, that may be a minority, but it's certainly not tiny. What's equally troubling is that if one takes into account those who are undecided about ISIS, the number climbs to 287 million! And, in Pakistan, a state with nuclear weapons, only 28% of the public view ISIS unfavorably.
Other surveys show that anti-Semitism runs rampant in Muslim countries too — a whopping 74% among North African and Middle Eastern residents, including 92% in Iraq. Many Muslims also support the death penalty for those who leave Islam. According to the Washington Post, 88% of Muslims in Egypt support the death penalty for converting, and 62% in Pakistan.
These are the actual facts of Islam, not the sanitized fiction President Obama perpetuates. Though many Muslims practice a gentler, kinder form of this religion, Islam is inherently violent and intolerant. Instead of pretending it's not, we need to expose it, address it, and recognize its link to jihadist behavior.
Ideas matter and evil exists. Obama's multi-culturalism, on the other hand, is a dangerous fantasy.

Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/barack-obama-islamic-extremism-quran-multiculturalism-152095/#Ozsi7hvRTBqD98VJ.99


 Wayuu bags


Obamacare


El sistema de salud de Estados Unidos necesita una buena reforma, pero no la clase de cambios decretados por la nueva ley de atención médica.
La Ley de Protección al Paciente y Cuidado de Salud Asequible (PPACA), comúnmente conocida como “Obamacare”, arrastra a nuestro sistema de salud en la dirección equivocada.
Esta ley tan impopular impone control federal sobre beneficios y financiación de la atención médica, establece un complejo sistema de salud de modelo único y centraliza las decisiones de la atención médica de América en Washington.
En lugar de eso, el Congreso debería transformar el sistema de salud en uno que empodere a personas y familias – no a Washington – para controlar un mayor número de decisiones respecto a su atención médica.
En Heritage Libertad lo mantendremos al día con información actualizada sobre Obamacare. Aquí ponemos a disposición del lector una explicación en profundidad del tema a través de los trabajos de investigación elaborados por expertos de la Fundación Heritage que exploran el impacto de cambiar nuestro sistema de salud y proponen soluciones efectivas a problemas específicos. Igualmente, ofrecemos breves artículos de opinión para el lector que busca una lectura rápida y concisa sobre Obamacare.
– El impacto sobre los no asegurados–  El impacto sobre los estados
– El impacto sobre las familias–  El impacto sobre las empresas
– El impacto sobre los mayores–  El impacto sobre su futuro
– El impacto sobre los médicos–  Derogar Obamacare

Continue leyendo.... http://libertad.org/obamacare

Inhofe: Climate Change Science Ignores God's Power

Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., a vocal climate science denialist, criticized President Obama’s participation in a Paris summit to address climate change yesterday, saying that climate science ignores the role of God in determining global temperatures.
Inhofe told Family Research Council president Tony Perkins on his “Washington Watch” program that Americans simply don’t care about the issue anymore and that there is nothing the U.S. government can do to reduce carbon dioxide emissions anyway.
“I know there are some out there, probably a couple hundred people, who actually believe that the world is coming to an end and man-made global warming is going to cause it, so I just want to give them the assurance that if they’re right and we are wrong, [proposed climate policies are] not going to reduce but it will increase CO2 emissions,” he said.
“They don’t understand,” he added. “God’s still up there and there’s a reason for this to happen.”
Inhofe went on to argue that human activities cannot affect the climate as the atmosphere naturally fluctuates between cooling and warming periods.

FILED UNDER

- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/inhofe-climate-change-science-ignores-gods-power#sthash.O3TYfaCu.dpuf

jueves, 10 de diciembre de 2015

Obama "More interested in Gays in the military than defeating the enemy"....Cambio Climatico? El clima ha cambiado SIEMPRE!!!...Sexual radicals are coming after "Your Family"

Cruz: Obama ‘More Interested in Promoting Homosexuality in the Military Than He Is in Defeating Our Enemy’

By Michael W. Chapman | December 9, 2015 | 1:22 PM EST
Sen. Ted Cruz.  (AP) 
 
Morale in the U.S. military has “plummeted” in recent years because President Barack Obama “doesn’t support our soldiers,” won’t even name the enemy “radical Islamic terrorism,” and is “more interested in promoting homosexuality in the military” than in “defeating our enemy,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).
During a conference call with Bishop E.W. Jackson of the National Emergency Coalition (NEC), Senator Cruz said, “You look at the military and one of the things we’ve seen is morale in the military under the Obama administration has plummeted, and it has plummeted because you have a commander-in-chief that doesn’t support our soldiers and sailors and airmen and Marines."
http://www.mrctv.org/videos/cruz-obama-more-interested-promoting-homosexuality-military-he-defeating-our-enemy
“You have a commander-in-chief that doesn’t stand up against our enemies, that won’t even acknowledge or say the words ‘radical Islamic terrorism,’” said Cruz. “And you have a commander-in-chief that treats the military as a cauldron for social experimentation.”
“He’s more interested in promoting homosexuality in the military than he is in defeating our enemy,” said the senator.

“So, for example,” he added,  “the military is now focused on trying to promote transgender soldiers. The role of the military is not to be some left-wing social experiment.”
“The reason we have the brave men and women who sign up as servicemen and women to defend this nation is to stand for our values, to protect our safety and security, to protect innocent men and women, and to stand up and defeat our enemies,” said Cruz.
In conclusion, he said,  “I would stop the shameless politicizing of our military to push a left-wing agenda that is contrary to the values and contrary to who we are as an American people and a nation founded on Judeo-Christian values.”
Senator Cruz, 44, is married and has two children. He holds degrees from Princeton University and Harvard Law School, and is a Southern Baptist. 

 Wayuu Bags

Michael W. Chapman
Michael W. Chapman
Michael W. Chapman

Obama y sus ridículas lecciones de historia y el cambio climático

La semana pasada, el presidente Barack Obama trató de darnos una lección de historia sobre el cambio climático. “Cuando los seres humanos se ven presionados, entonces suceden cosas malas”, dijo Obama. “Si nos fijamos en la historia mundial, cada vez que la gente está desesperada, cuando a la gente le falta alimento, cuando la gente no puede ganarse la vida o cuidar de su familia, allí es cuando surgen ideologías que son peligrosas”.
Bienvenidos a saltos en la lógica que podrían abarcar el Gran Cañón del Colorado. Al parecer, cambios insoportablemente lentos, contradictorios y a veces casi imperceptibles en la temperatura de la atmósfera son capaces de producir ideologías como el comunismo, el fascismo y ahora el yihadismo islámico, aunque el presidente no vaya a usar ese término. No importan todos esos detalles históricos acerca de lo que realmente produjo el ascenso de estas ideologías – trastornos sociales como la industrialización, disputas filosóficas desatadas por la Ilustración y las crisis dentro del islam. El presidente ya sabe lo que pasó.
Es el clima – una especie de determinismo meteorológico muy propio de un marxista climático.
Siempre lista a jugárselo todo en una mala idea, la asesora de Seguridad Nacional del presidente, Susan Rice, saltó a la palestra. Ella culpabiliza al cambio climático por la guerra civil siria.
Esto será una gran sorpresa para los manifestantes que en marzo de 2011 se vieron tiroteados por las fuerzas de seguridad de Asad. No estaban interesados en lo más mínimo en la sequía que Rice y otros arguyen causaron la guerra.
Los manifestantes no estaban pidiendo agua sino democracia y como cualquier universitario de segundo año sabría, los disturbios que dieron origen al conflicto no fueron debido a un clima seco sino por la opresión de Asad.
Si no me cree, créale a Richard Seager, coautor del informe que generó la teoría de que la guerra siria “fue culpa del cambio climático”. Después de argüir que el calentamiento global hizo que empeorara la sequía siria, añade rápidamente, “No estamos diciendo que la sequía provocara la guerra [siria]”.
Claro que la sequía no la provocó; eso sería absurdo.
Y sin embargo, eso es precisamente lo que Rice quiere que Ud. crea. Seager puede ponerse a salvo con una negación categórica a posteriori, pero él, Rice y otros como ellos saben que sus partidarios sí entenderán su verdadero significado.
Estos saltos en la lógica tienen un nombre. Se llaman sofismas.
Declaraciones vagas sobre lo que la “ciencia” que supuestamente significa se quedan colgando en el aire como meras sugerencias para después ser negadas o adoptadas dependiendo de lo útiles que sean para la agenda política. Ése es el significado literal de la sofística: el uso de argumentación sutilmente engañosa para hacer que una falsedad suene a verdad, más crudamente conocida como una mentira.
¿Puede haber alguna duda de por qué tantas personas son tan escépticas sobre las afirmaciones hechas por los defensores del cambio climático? En lugar de aplicar un cauto método científico, nos dan alarmismo y especulaciones que no se pueden respaldar con hechos.
Sugiero que el presidente tome algunos cursos de lógica e historia. Se los debe haber perdido cuando estudió en la Universidad de Columbia. Si no quiere hacerlo, entonces Obama al menos podría ahorrarnos sus inanes lecciones de historia mundial.

FRC: 'Sexual Radicals' Are Coming After 'Your Family'

An urgent fundraising appeal from the Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins today:
I've never seen a year like 2015.
And 2016 may be worse—unless Christians like us get ready now.
In 2015, radicals in Washington (including the government), New York, Hollywood, big corporations, and every part of America have declared war on your values. Your family. Your religious beliefs and freedom.
LAST WINTER, a major city ordered pastors to surrender their sermons on transgenderism and homosexuality for challenging the mayor's push for a dangerous special rights ordinance.
EARLY IN THE YEAR, sexual radicals and huge corporations attacked states that attempted to pass laws protecting freedom to believe, and "politically correct" extremists tried to destroy the career of a Navy Chaplain because he counseled from the Bible.
IN THE SUMMER, sexual activists used the Supreme Court's arrogant decision imposing same-sex marriage on America to assail the fundamental rights of anyone who disagreed . . . even throwing a Christian county clerk in jail.
IN THE FALL, they pressed ahead with a campaign of policies and laws trying to erase the distinction of men's and women's restrooms and persecute people of faith who disagree.

- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/frc-sexual-radicals-are-coming-after-your-family#sthash.0a3jj3Lv.dpuf