Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta artur davis. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta artur davis. Mostrar todas las entradas

miércoles, 29 de agosto de 2012

Ex-Dem now Conservative!!!...Stock collapse?....Obamacare steals from Medicare

'Lesson Learned': Ex-Dem Davis Electrifies RNC



28 Aug 2012

Former Rep. Artur Davis (D-AL), the man who gave one of the nomination speeches for President Barack Obama before becoming a Republican and moving to Virginia, spoke tonight at the Republican National Committee, where he electrified the crowd with a spectacular attack on the presidency of Barack Obama. His central appeal was to independents and Democrats, whom he implored to reconsider their support of the failed president.



He arrived onstage to a standing ovation. “Ladies and gentlemen, thank you. Some of you may know, the last time I spoke at a convention, it turned out I was in the wrong place.



"So, Tampa, my fellow Republicans, thank you for welcoming me where I belong.”


Davis praised Mitt Romney as a serious candidate, as opposed to the current president. “He has no illusions about what makes America great, and he doesn't confuse the presidency with celebrity, or loftiness with leadership,” said Davis, before launching into an explanation of why so many independents and Democrats were turning away from that celebrity-driven president.


“Now, America is a land of second chances,” said Davis, “and I gather you have room for the estimated 6 million of us who know we got it wrong in 2008 and who want to fix it.” He continued: READ MORE



Wayuu Messenger Bag

 NEED CASH...BANCO SOCIAL $500 @ 2Mos.

Is There Going To Be A Stock Market Crash In The Fall?


The Economic Collapse
Aug 29, 2012

Is the stock market going to crash by the end of this year?  Are we on the verge of major financial chaos on a global scale? Well, this is the time of the year when investors start getting nervous.

We all remember what happened during the fall of 1929, the fall of 1987 and the fall of 2008.  However, it is important to keep in mind that we do not see a stock market crash in the fall of every year.  Some years the stock market cruises through the months of September, October, November and December without any problems whatsoever.  But this year conditions certainly seem to be right for a “perfect storm” to develop.  Technical indicators are screaming that a stock market decline is imminent and sources in the financial industry all over the world are warning that a massive crisis is on the way.  In fact, the Telegraph ran a story with the following shocking headline the other day: “Market crash ‘could hit within weeks’, warn bankers“. 

What you are about to read should alarm you.  But it is not a guarantee that anything will or will not happen.  When Ben Bernanke gives his speech at the Jackson Hole summit on Friday he could announce to the rest of the world that the Federal Reserve has decided to launch QE3 and that the Fed will be printing up trillions of new dollars.  If that happened global financial markets would leap for joy.  So it is always a dangerous thing when anyone out there tries to tell you that they can “guarantee” what is about to happen in the financial world.  There are just so many moving parts.  But if we do not see major intervention by the governments of the world or by global central banks a major financial crisis could rapidly develop this fall.  The conditions are certainly right for a stock market collapse, and we could easily see a repeat of what happened back in 2008.
The truth is that the second half of 2012 looks a little bit more like the second half of 2008 with each passing day.
For example, credit default swaps are soaring just like we saw back during the last financial crisis.  The following is from a recent article in the Telegraph by Harry Wilson and Philip Aldrick…. READ MORE



NECESITA AYUDA ECONOMICA? BANCO SOCIAL $500 @ 2 Meses

Cómo Obamacare le roba a Medicare y perjudica a nuestros mayores





Las guerras retóricas sobre Medicare han subido de temperatura esta semana, después de que el presidente Obama declarara en su discurso radiofónico del sábado que sus propuestas de reforma “no tocarán sus beneficios de Medicare garantizados. No a cambio de tan poco”.

Pero eso es incorrecto. Obamacare quita $716,000 millones de Medicare durante  los próximos 10 años, según la Oficina de Presupuesto del Congreso (CBO) y utiliza estos “ahorros” en Medicare para financiar otras ampliaciones de los derechos a beneficios a los que obliga Obamacare. Medicare se convierte así en la gallina de los huevos de oro para Obamacare y los “ahorros” en Medicare provenientes de las reducciones de los pagos de este no se devuelven para hacer solvente Medicare. Unas reducciones de los pagos de Medicare tan enormes ciertamente perjudican a los beneficios de Medicare, así como al acceso de las personas mayores a esos beneficios.

La analista de la Fundación Heritage Alyene Senger explica cómo perjudica esto a las personas mayores de Estados Unidos:
El perjuicio de esas reducciones irá en detrimento del acceso de las personas mayores a la atención. El informe de 2012 de los consejeros de Medicare concluye que estos menores índices de pago de Medicare causarán el que, según se estima, un 15% de los hospitales, de las instalaciones de enfermería especializadas y de las agencias de atención a domicilio operen con pérdidas para 2019, el 25% opere con pérdidas en 2030 y un 40% para 2050. Operar con pérdidas significa que es probable que estas instalaciones reduzcan sus servicios a los pacientes de Medicare o que cierren sus puertas, dificultando que las personas mayores accedan a estos servicios.
El presidente también comentó el sábado que “Como presidente, mi objetivo ha sido fortalecer ahora estos programas y conservarlos para generaciones futuras”. Pero Obamacare impone nuevos impuestos a las generaciones presentes y futuras, incluido un nuevo “impuesto sobre la nómina” para Medicare que ni siquiera va a parar a Medicare. Senger detalla que:

El impuesto sobre la nómina financia Medicare Parte A, el fondo fiduciario que se prevé que se haga insolvente ya en 2024. Obamacare incrementa este impuesto desde el 2.9% hasta el 3.8%, lo que se prevé que cueste a los contribuyentes $318,000 millones de 2013 a 2022. Sin embargo, por primera vez en la historia, Obamacare no usa los ingresos tributarios provenientes del aumento del impuesto sobre la nómina para Medicare para pagar Medicare; el dinero se utiliza para financiar otras partes de Obamacare, como ocurre con gran parte de los $716,000 millones de las reducciones. READ MORE

INVEST IN BANCO SOCIAL... UP TO $5K @ 6 Mos ... 10%!!!




jueves, 31 de mayo de 2012

Why is The Democratic Party loosing support?

Artur Davis, Former Black Caucus Member, Switches to GOP

 

Artur Davis was first elected to Congress from Alabama in 2002. The Harvard Law School grad was quickly tapped as a rising star among Democrats. He became a Senior Whip for the caucus, co-chair the New Democrat Coalition and even headed up the Southern region for the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee. His eight years in Congress showed him to be a thoughtful, independent and energetic member. Yesterday, he announced he is now a Republican.

Davis made the announcement on his blog. His own words speak louder than anything I could write.
But parties change. As I told a reporter last week, this is not Bill Clinton’s Democratic Party (and he knows that even if he can’t say it).  If you have read this blog, and taken the time to look for a theme in the thousands of words (or free opposition research) contained in it, you see the imperfect musings of a voter who describes growth as a deeper problem than exaggerated inequality; who wants to radically reform the way we educate our children; who despises identity politics and the practice of speaking for groups and not one national interest; who knows that our current course on entitlements will eventually break our solvency and cause us to break promises to our most vulnerable—that is, if we don’t start the hard work of fixing it.
On the specifics, I have regularly criticized an agenda that would punish businesses and job creators with more taxes just as they are trying to thrive again. I have taken issue with an administration that has lapsed into a bloc by bloc appeal to group grievances when the country is already too fractured: frankly, the symbolism of Barack Obama winning has not given us the substance of a united country. You have also seen me write that faith institutions should not be compelled to violate their teachings because faith is a freedom, too. You’ve read that in my view, the law can’t continue to favor one race over another in offering hard-earned slots in colleges: America has changed, and we are now diverse enough that we don’t need to accommodate a racial spoils system. And you know from these pages that I still think the way we have gone about mending the flaws in our healthcare system is the wrong way—it goes further than we need and costs more than we can bear.
Taken together, these are hardly the enthusiasms of a Democrat circa 2012, and they wouldn’t be defensible in a Democratic primary. But they are the thoughts and values of ten years of learning, and seeing things I once thought were true fall into disarray. So, if I were to leave the sidelines, it would be as a member of the Republican Party that is fighting the drift in this country in a way that comes closest to my way of thinking: wearing a Democratic label no longer matches what I know about my country and its possibilities.
Do read the whole thing.
Barack Obama campaigned on changing politics in America. He certainly succeeded, but not in the way he or his supporters envisioned. Over the past decade, the progressive left has pulled off a hostile takeover of the Democrat party. Today's party is not the one of just a generation ago.
Artur Davis didn't leave the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party left Artur Davis.

Read Artur Davis complete post

We are GOOD .... The left wants to tell us different!

Couple gives Houston waiter $5,000 tip

While most people had three days off this weekend for Memorial Day, one waiter is very glad he was working.

That's because one of his customers left a tip of more than 18,000 percent.
"I'm just humbled by it, that's all," D'Amicos Italian Cafe waiter Greg Rubar said.
Rubar still can't believe how his bad luck turned into good fortune.
"I think it was three or four weeks ago, it was a Friday night, it was raining really hard," he said.
Rubar was heading home a few weeks ago when high water ruined his car.
"The way I work, hours I work, it was very hard to take the bus, I was taking a cab a lot," he said.
Rubar has worked at D'Amicos for 16 years and one couple in particular have become very good customers over the past eight years. Rubar told them about his car problem but never expected what would happen this past Saturday.
"They just came in and gave me money to buy a car, told me to go buy a car with it," Rubar said.
Those longtime customers gave Rubar an envelope, filled with $5,000 in cash.
"It's enough money to go buy you a nice car. I didn't even look at it. I was hesitant about it, but he said, 'No you take it and buy you a car!'" Rubar said. "People can be generous, you know? They told me they felt like I deserved this."
Rubar says no one has ever done anything like this for him. His boss is overwhelmed at the generosity of the two customers.
"And also that we have staff that our customers feel so close to that they could willingly and wantingly do something like that for them," the restaurant's VP Brina D'Amicos said.
Rubar says another customer is helping him select a used vehicle to buy. He also has a message for his two special friends.
"Thank you very, very much. I mean I did need it and I'm gonna buy a car with it; that's what that money's gonna go to -- every cent," he said.
The two customers wish to remain anonymous. Rubar has not seen them since they gave him the money. Rubar says he plans to get his new vehicle soon.
(Copyright ©2012 KTRK-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.) 
Check out Colombia and the new Free Trade Agreement...Reach Out 

90,000 Murdered for Being Catholics!!! All being covered up and rarely mentioned

Bozell Column: Viva Cristo Rey!

By Brent Bozell | May 29, 2012 

Brent Bozell's pictureWhen I first heard For Greater Glory (originally titled Cristiada, which I prefer) was being shot I was stunned – and skeptical. It could never be produced by Hollywood. In fact, it wouldn’t be a theatrical release, maybe a short documentary, certainly with a small budget. On the former I was correct: it was made in Mexico. On the latter I was wrong. It’s a full-fledged, major motion picture, with grade-A talent. And it’s wonderful.

The cast includes Andy Garcia, Eva Longoria, Peter O’Toole (in a cameo role as a murdered priest, the octogenerian is splendid), Ruben Blades and Mexican star Eduardo Verastegui. This is serious stuff.
The movie depicts the Mexican Cristero uprising against the military dictatorship of President Plutarco Calles between 1926 and 1929. Calles was an ardent anti-Catholic in a nation dominated by Catholics. At his command Catholic churches were ordered shuttered, the Mass outlawed and many priests murdered.

The most famous moment in the struggle, not depicted in the film, was the martyrdom of Padre Miguel Pro, ordered shot by firing squad by Calles in 1927, with the heart-wrenching final moments (Pro kneeling in prayer, then standing, his arms extended in the sign of the cross as bullets shatter him, Pro shot point blank when the fusillade didn’t kill him) photographed by order of the Presidente. Padre Pro was beatified by Pope John Paul II the Great in 1988.

I was shown the early trailers because of the family connection. My grandfather Will Buckley Sr. was a strong supporter of the Cristeros. A devout Catholic with business interests in Mexico and an ardent love of that country, so much so that he planned to move his family there, Buckley provided materiel aid to the impoverished peasants. Some things we know to be true. He was targeted for assassination; his oil leases were expropriated by the government; he was expelled. Others are in question: that there was actual attempt to kill him (another version has it that the assassins turned and offered him assistance should he want someone capped); that a train he hired to smuggle in arms from El Paso (maybe) became lost, wandered about at night, ultimately found its way back to El Paso and the weapons were confiscated; and that his heirs were also banished but don’t tell my cousin who has been practicing law there for decades.

You know nothing of this uprising? Not to worry, virtually no one does. That included the primary actors. Garcia tells the Huffington Post he knew nothing, but understands it, given that the same catastrophe befell native Cuba, where it “was not only the taking away of religious rights, they curtailed and took away all rights.” Even Verastegui, a fervent Catholic, admits he was ignorant of this struggle because of the Mexican public school system. That has changed now thanks to the soft-spoken and elegant Mexican real estate developer-turned-producer Pablo Jose Barroso.

Much is being written about the timing of the movie’s release in the wake of the Obama administration’s anti-religious mandate and on the eve of the bishops’ planned “Fortnight for Freedom” June 21 through July 4. The timing is extraordinary but fortuitous. The movie was planned before President Obama’s assault against the Catholic Church.

But just the idea of the connection brings out the worst in the secularist press. Slant magazine pans it as a film “that gives the screen epic a bad name.” It attacks the “solemn speechifying,” the “overstuffed cast of characters,” the “half-baked material,” and given “this religion is specifically Catholic… [the movie] …makes the material a tough sell.” When Garcia’s character ultimately converts to Christianity, “we’re back to embracing a worldview where the implied mandate to practice Catholicism feels near as onerous as the inability to do so.”


READ MORE