Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta deficits. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta deficits. Mostrar todas las entradas

sábado, 13 de octubre de 2012

Where's the money?...Obama or Clinton? ...Cristobal Colon y USA

US Deficit Tops $1 Trillion for Fourth Year


12 Oct 2012
By MARTIN CRUTSINGER
AP Economics Writer
WASHINGTON
The U.S. budget deficit has topped $1 trillion for a fourth straight year, but a modest improvement in economic growth helped narrow the gap by $207 billion compared with last year.

The Treasury Department said Friday the deficit for the 2012 budget year totaled $1.1 trillion. Tax revenue rose 6.4 percent from last year to more than $2.4 trillion, helping contain the deficit.

The government's revenue rose as more people got jobs and received income. Corporations also contributed more tax revenue than in 2011.

Government spending fell 1.7 percent to $3.5 trillion. The decline reflected, in part, less defense spending as U.S. military involvement in Iraq was winding down.

Barack Obama's presidency has now coincided with four straight $1 trillion-plus annual budget deficits _ the first in history and an issue in an election campaign that ends in Nov. 6.

Obama's Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, contends that Obama failed to achieve a pledge to halve the deficit he inherited by the end of his first term.

When Obama took office in January 2009, the Congressional Budget Office forecast that the deficit for that year would total $1.2 trillion. It ended up at a record $1.41 trillion.

The increase was due, in part, to higher government spending to fight the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s Tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan contributed to the deficits.

The budget gaps in 2010 and 2011 were slightly lower than the 2009 deficit as a gradually strengthening economy generated more tax revenue. But the deficits still exceeded $1 trillion.

Obama is campaigning for a second term with a pledge to cut deficits by $4 trillion over the next decade. He says he would do so by ending the Bush-era income tax cuts for higher-income Americans and by restraining the growth of spending.

Romney has said he would cut spending growth to help narrow the budget gap. He would cap spending at 20 percent of the economy by 2016. Spending in 2012 accounted for about 23 percent of the economy.

The government borrowed about 31 cents of every dollar it spent in 2012. The string of $1 trillion-plus deficits has driven the national debt above $16 trillion. The magnitude of that figure has intensified debate in Congress over spending and taxes but little movement toward compromise.

Many fear the budget deadlock will send the economy over a "fiscal cliff" next year, when tax increases and deep spending cuts will take effect unless a budget deal is reached.

Obama wants to eliminate the income tax cuts for families that make more than $250,000.

Republicans in Congress and Romney have resisted. They argue that with the economy still weak, the government should not be raising anyone's taxes.

Congress may address the budget crisis during a lame-duck session of Congress after the November elections.

The Perfect Shake

Reach Out to the Hispanic Community...Make sure your communication is Clear and Direct: A Spanish consultant reviews all your legal documents, manuals, marketing branding, merchandising, forms, warning signs, communications, etc. to get it RIGHT

Libya Fallout Gives Rise to Obama-Clinton Feud


13 Oct 2012

A nasty rift has opened up between President Barack Obama, former President Bill Clinton, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over the fallout from the terrorist attacks on the U.S. consulate in Libya that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens. This feud may undermine and threaten Obama’s reelection chances. 

Obama and Clinton both do not want to be held responsible for the negligence before and the cover-up after the Libya attacks. Clinton biographer Ed Klein on Friday reported that Bill Clinton, sensing Obama’s political team wants to pin legal and political blame on the State Department and Hillary Clinton, has been working on doomsday and contingency scenarios “to avoid having Benghazi become a stain on her political fortunes should she decide to run for president in 2016.”

“If relations between Obama’s White House and Hillary’s State Department rupture publicly over the growing Benghazi scandal, that could damage the Democratic ticket and dim Obama’s chances for re-election,” Klein writes.

According to Klein’s sources, Bill Clinton has assembled an informal legal team in case there are cables or other evidence that would legally implicate Hillary. Klein also told The Daily Caller that Bill has even considered advising Hillary to resign if the Obama administration tries to make her the “scapegoat.”
On Friday, there were signs the White House was preparing to do to throw Hillary Clinton and the State Department under the bus. 

White House press secretary Jay Carney, when asked if Obama and Biden had "never been briefed" about the fact that more security was needed in Libya, essentially blamed the State Department, saying, “matters of security personnel are appropriately discussed and decided upon at the State Department by those responsible for it.”

Carney repeated a variation of this line throughout the press briefing. 
Carney's comments came a day after Vice President Joe Biden not only contradicted State Department officials but himself threw the intelligence community under the bus when he said the Obama administration did not know U.S. interests in Libya needed more security before the attacks and that the intelligence community changed its story after. READ MORE


INVEST SAFELY IN BANCO SOCIAL...Up to $5,000 at 6 Mos. 10% ROI!!!

Cristóbal Colón: ¿Icono de Estados Unidos?


Un día como hoy, Cristóbal Colón descubrió América en 1492 y por eso, este día se celebra en el continente americano y España. Pero en realidad, para Estados Unidos el Día de Colón es un feriado algo raro. No se conmemora a un presidente o a un gran estadista americano. El gran navegante genovés descubrió América, pero no descubrió ni fundó Estados Unidos.
 
A medida que se acercaba el Día de Colón de este año, el presidente Obama trató de cambiar sutilmente el enfoque de la fiesta. En vez de celebrar simplemente a un audaz explorador, quería también centrar la atención en los “pueblos indígenas que habían habitado el hemisferio occidental durante milenios”. Su proclamación presidencial invitaba a los americanos a “reflexionar sobre la trágica carga que las comunidades tribales soportaron en los años que siguieron [a la llegada de Colón]…[y a] conmemorar las muchas contribuciones que estas han realizado a la experiencia americana y a que continuemos fortaleciendo los lazos que nos unen a día de hoy”.

Pero esto pasa por alto el significado de por qué Estados Unidos celebra el Día de Colón.
Leon Kass, Amy Kass y Diana Schuab proporcionan una rigurosa visión general de la historia y la tradición del Día de Colón en su plan de estudios What So Proudly We Hail (Lo que con tanto orgullo proclamamos). De hecho, Colón fue una figura importante para muchas comunidades de inmigrantes. Y más aún, Cristóbal Colón ha sido desde hace mucho tiempo un icono americano.

“La asociación entre Colón y Estados Unidos continuó prosperando a medida que los colonos revolucionarios buscaban distanciarse de Inglaterra”, observa el plan de estudios. “En Colón hallaron a un héroe que se había atrevido a cruzar un mar desconocido, dejando atrás el Viejo Continente para dar un nuevo comienzo en una tierra virgen, como estaban intentando hacer muchos de ellos”. Hacia finales del siglo XVIII, los americanos veían a Colón como “una mítica figura fundacional”. Y en el siglo XIX, era visto como “arquetipo del ideal americano: atrevido, aventurero, innovador”.

Nadie recoge esto mejor que Ronald Reagan. En una proclamación presidencial de 1988, Reagan conmemora a Colón por su espíritu: “Era un soñador, un hombre de gran visión y coraje, un hombre lleno de esperanza por el futuro y con la determinación de soltar amarras hacia lo desconocido y navegar por un mar inexplorado buscando la satisfacción de descubrir lo que allí hubiese. Mézclenlo todo y se podría decir que Colón fue el inventor del Sueño Americano”.

Lejos de ser un día para recordar nuestras divisiones o para hacer hincapié en nuestros errores pasados, el Día de Colón es un día para celebrar un Sueño Americano que valora la diversidad, sí, pero que también recompensa a los atrevidos y audaces. O como dijo Reagan, “no sólo [por ser] un intrépido explorador sino por los sueños y oportunidades que trajeron a tantos hasta aquí después de él”.

NECESITAS AYUDA TEMPORAL?...BANCO SOCIAL te OFRECE $500 a 2 Meses

Wayuu Bags



jueves, 24 de mayo de 2012

Do you research your news?...or just go with the flow...

NBC Massages Poll Results to Show Obama Leading in Key Swing States

 

NBC, soon to be joined by the rest of the media, is swooning over three new polls that all show Obama edging Mitt Romney in the critical swing states of Ohio, Virginia and Florida. The leads are very slim: 4 points in Virginia and Florida and 6 points in Ohio. And, leads have dropped considerably since March. Still, the NBC/Marist poll is the first bit of good news the Obama campaign has had in a few weeks. Too bad NBC had to massage the numbers a bit to get there. 

First, all of these polls are of registered voters, rather than adults or likely voters. As we've discussed, that implies a 4% bias for Democrats, which effectively makes the race in these states ties. There are however legitimate reasons to poll only registered voters this early out, so that isn't in any way cheating.
The cheating part comes in how to "weight" the sample to make it fit the pollster assumptions about the electorate. The pollster, ideally, would like the sample to match the partisan make-up he expects in the coming election. If you over- or under-sample one party, this will skew the results. Boy, were the results skewed.
In the Florida poll, the partisan screen of the sample was D-43, R-35, I-21. Yes, that's right. The pollster assumes that 43% of the voters showing up on election day will be Democrats. In 2008, the absolute high-water mark of the Obama candidacy, when he narrowly won Florida, the partisan breakdown was D-37, R-34, I-29. Does NBC really think that, since 2008, there has been such a massive shift to Democrats? Is that reflected anywhere in the country except the studios of MSNBC? Read More



Bill Clinton's glamorous fundraiser called "worst party ever" by angry guests

An exclusive event hosted by Bill Clinton and attended by a host of celebrity friends has been criticized after guests who paid up to £1,000 for tickets were left queuing outside for hours.

An exclusive event hosted by Bill Clinton and attended by a host of celebrity friends has been criticised after guests who paid up to £1,000 for tickets were left queuing outside for hours.

Hosted by Bill Clinton (right), the night was attended by actress Gwyneth Paltrow (left) Photo: Rex
 
Attendees complained the underground venue “stank”, with perspiration “dripping off the walls” and the rooms too crowded to even see the former president.
One, who called it the “worst party ever” described how “angry people” were waiting in the queue outside while high-profile guests were admitted, and another condemned the event as “unpleasant”.
The evening had been intended as a fundraising event for the Clinton Foundation Millennium Network, which was set up to “encourage the next generation to address global challenges”.
Hosted by Bill Clinton and his daughter Chelsea, the night was attended by actress Gwyneth Paltrow, model Lily Cole, performer Will.I.Am and Princess Beatrice.
Glamorous photographs of the event document Clinton’s short speech addressing the issue of climate change, as well smartly-dressed attendees enjoying themselves.
A standard ticket to the event cost £125, with some understood to have paid up to £1,000 for a chance to meet the politician. Read More

Real federal deficit dwarfs official tally

The typical American household would have paid nearly all of its income in taxes last year to balance the budget if the government used standard accounting rules to compute the deficit, a USA TODAY analysis finds

http://i.usatoday.net/news/_photos/2012/05/18/Real-federal-deficit-dwarfs-official-tally-151HMME8-x.jpg

Under those accounting practices, the government ran red ink last year equal to $42,054 per household — nearly four times the official number reported under unique rules set by Congress.
A U.S. household's median income is $49,445, the Census reports.
The big difference between the official deficit and standard accounting: Congress exempts itself from including the cost of promised retirement benefits. Yet companies, states and local governments must include retirement commitments in financial statements, as required by federal law and private boards that set accounting rules.
The deficit was $5 trillion last year under those rules. The official number was $1.3 trillion. Liabilities for Social Security, Medicare and other retirement programs rose by $3.7 trillion in 2011, according to government actuaries, but the amount was not registered on the government's books. Read More