Clinton will lead "Tremendous Majorities of Kids" to Homosexuality!....Mujer y Libertad!...323,999 Americans killed in 2015!!!

Kevin Swanson: Hillary Clinton Will Lead 'Tremendous Majorities of American Kids' To Homosexuality

SUBMITTED BY Miranda Blue on Tuesday, 12/29/2015 12:14 pm

Far-right Colorado pastor Kevin Swanson got some negative publicity last month when he managed to get three Republican presidential candidates to speak at an event he organized, where he spent most of his speaking time warning that America must repent for such sins as birth control, liking Harry Potter too much and failing to execute gay people.

On his “Generations Radio” program yesterday, Swanson said that although he was “severely mocked” for his remarks at the conference, it is true that America must repent or God will punish the nation through the election of Hillary Clinton, who will in turn lead “tremendous majorities of American kids” down “the track towards homosexuality” and other sexual sins.

Swanson got on the subject while discussing a recent case in Massachusetts in which a judge found that a Catholic school violated a state nondiscrimination law when it pulled a job offer from its food services director after he listed his husband as an emergency contact.

Swanson warned that this was all part of the “preparation for the Greek form of education, which, as you know, involves whatever’s going on in gymnasia, very, very ugly stuff” and that the nation is “going in the direction of Harry Potter’s mentor and Hiccup’s mentor in ‘How to Train Your Dragon,’” whom he says are gay.

The only way to save America, he said, is to keep enough kids out of public schools, which are teaching them to be “polytheists and socialists” and to get enough Americans to repent, otherwise God will fail to “have mercy on this nation” and allow Clinton to be elected president.

If America fails to repent, he asked, “Why wouldn’t Hillary Clinton get full rein upon this nation to continue the destructive pattern, destroy the social fabric of the nation — the family, of course — so that of course there will be 75 percent of kids born outside of wedlock to single mothers by the year 2030, so to be sure that tremendous majorities of American kids are taken down the track towards homosexuality, towards the destruction of sexuality with pornography habits, illegitimate divorce, the shack-up rates being 30 times what they were in 1970 and so forth?”

FILED UNDER

PEOPLE: Kevin Swanson

Mujer y libertad

Javier Paz García

28 / 12 / 2015

0 Comments

En 1869, John Stuart Mill publicó The Subjection of Women y argumentaba a favor de la total igualdad entre los sexos. En esos tiempos, tal propuesta era revolucionaria y muy contraria a las normas y costumbres en todo el mundo.

Hoy la cultura occidental reconoce, aunque a veces sólo en teoría, que la mujer tiene los mismos derechos que el hombre. En el siglo XXI, tal proposición debería ser una verdad de Perogrullo. Sin embargo, en muchos países, incluso de tradición occidental, muchas mujeres siguen sometidas a los designios del hombre, ya sea del padre o del esposo y tanto las normas sociales, como la legislación, hacen que las mujeres no gocen de todos los derechos que les corresponden.

Más triste aun es la situación del género femenino en culturas diferentes a la occidental, donde la mujer es privada de libertades civiles y políticas elementales. El islamismo por ejemplo, de la manera en que se practica en buena parte del mundo implica una negación de tales libertades.

Y para ser justos, el catolicismo actual mantiene una discriminación odiosa entre el hombre y la mujer, tal discriminación no pasa de lo eclesiástico, mientras que en el islam traspasa a lo civil y político. Felizmente hay avances en el mundo y en Arabia Saudita las mujeres pudieron votar y postularse a cargos públicos por primera vez en la historia. Aunque todavía queda mucho por recorrer (en este país las mujeres no pueden manejar vehículos y deben pedir el permiso de sus maridos para todo), el voto universal es un gran avance.

En nuestra Latinoamérica, también hay razones para alegrarnos del rol del género femenino en la lucha por la libertad. En Venezuela, dos mujeres, Lilian Tintori y María Corina Machado, han jugado un rol fundamental en la defensa de los valores de la libertad y han contribuido a frenar seriamente las aspiraciones totalitarias del liberticida régimen chavista.

Finalmente, si una persona es inepta, impostora y fascista, uno no tiene por qué hacer miramientos contra tal persona a la hora de defender las ideas liberales, aunque sea mujer. Por tal motivo también me alegro por la señora Cristina Fernández de Kirchner que terminó su paupérrima gestión como presidenta de Argentina. Espero que vaya a disfrutar los millones de dólares de patrimonio que acumuló durante las presidencias de ella y su esposo y le haga el favor a los argentinos de no volver a postularse jamás.

© Javier Paz

Posted in Estudios, Opinión, Análisis, Asuntos internacionales, Actualidad,Destacables, Sociedad civil, Libertad humana

Planned Parenthood's New Annual Report: 323,999 Abortions; $553.7M in Government Money

By Penny Starr | December 30, 2015 | 12:19 PM EST

(AP Photo)

(CNSNews.com) – Planned Parenthood says in its new 2014-2015 annual report, which was released this month, that its affiliates around the country did 323,999 abortion procedures in the fiscal year that ended on Sept. 30, 2014 and that those affiliates received $553.7 million in “government health services grants and reimbursements” in the year that ended on June 30, 2015.

In its previous annual report, Planned Parenthood had reported that its affiliates did 327,653 abortions in the fiscal year that ended on Sept. 30, 2013 and that those affiliates had received $528.4 million in “government health services grants and reimbursements” in the year that ended on June 30, 2014.

Earlier Planned Parenthood annual reports say its affiliates did 327,166 abortion procedures in fiscal 2012 and 333,964 in fiscal 2011.

The amount of government money Planned Parenthood reported that its affiliates received increased in the latest annual report, climbing $25.3 million from $528.4 million in the year that ended on June 30, 2014 to the $553.7 million they received in the year that ended on June 30, 2015.

CNSNews.com contacted Planned Parenthood to ask why the organization has different 12-month periods for reporting services and revenues but no response was received.

 Follow

Penny Starr

Bio | Archive

More from Penny Starr

Christians Martyrs because of Islamist Extremism, Why?....25% of women seeking abortions were abused...Luchar contra la Pobreza: Trabajo y Matrimonio!!!

Report: Number of 'Martyred' Christians Nearly Doubled in 2013

by AWR Hawkins 8 Jan 2014

A report from the non-denominational group Open Doors says the number of Christians martyred around the world for their faith nearly doubled in 2013.

The report documents 2,123 Christians killed for their faith in 2013 versus 1,201 killed in 2012.
Details, carried in Reuters, show that over half the deaths took place Syria alone. However, because many of those deaths are due to heightened tensions from the civil war, Open Doors ranked "North Korea at the top of its list of 50 most dangerous countries for Christians. " The next four most dangerous were "Somalia, Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan."

Open Doors' France's Michael Varton said ongoing conflicts and wars that pit Islamists against others--as in Syria--are especially dangerous for Christians. The report says, "Islamist extremism is the worst persecutor of the church worldwide."

The report makes clear that in North Korea the issue isn't always the number of Christians killed but the number held as political prisoners for their faith. Open Doors estimates "50,000 to 70,000 [Christians] lived in political prison camps."

One-quarter of all women seeking an abortion were abused, new study finds

by Ben Johnson

• Wed Jan 08, 2014 13:56 EST

Updated at 3 p.m. EST to include remarks from Dr. David Reardon.
LONDON, January 8, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – One out of every four women who seeks an abortion has been a victim of abuse, according to a new meta-analysis.

 

 

In the study, which was published online yesterday in the peer-reviewed open access journal PLOS Medicine, the researchers found that intimate partner violence (IPV) is associated with higher abortion rates and repeat abortions.

The meta-analysis, which examined 74 studies of women around the world, found that between 2.5 and 30 percent of abused women have had an abortion within the last year. That rates soars to between 14 and 40 percent over a lifetime.

Physical, mental, psychological or sexual abuse – as well as “coerced decision-making” – were linked to higher abortion rates and repeat abortions. The authors refer to multiple studies over the last decade, including a 2005 report that found women were 10 times more likely to abort a planned pregnancy. Studies showed between two and 18 percent of women said they felt coerced to have the abortion.
Post-abortion women have testified that they were forced to abort by parents, boyfriends, ex-boyfriends, husbands, abusers, even policemen.

“These findings reinforce the broad consensus that there is a significant relationship between induced abortion and violence against women,” Dr. Jacqueline C. Harvey of the Reproductive Research Audit (RRA) told LifeSiteNews.com. This “suggests that for many women, the choice to have an abortion is not made freely, but from fear,” said Harvey, who testified about the issue before the Texas legislature last July.
Cheryl Sullenger, senior policy analyst at Operation Rescue, told LifeSiteNews the survey confirms her own observations. “The most dangerous time for women is during pregnancy when they are at risk of increased domestic violence attacks, especially if their partners want them to have an abortion against their will,” she said.

Even the National Organization for Women has recognized that murder is the leading cause of death for pregnant women.

Dr. David Reardon, director of The Elliot Institute, which produced a 21-page report on forced abortions in 2004, explained the psychology of the abusers to LifeSiteNews. “In most cases of abuse, these are not men who want to have children,” he said. “They see the pregnancy as threat to their freedom and control and domination, being the focus of the woman's affections, so they see the child as a threat to themselves.”
The forced abortions can lead to a vicious circle of abuse, he warned. “As a result of an increased guilt, anger, rage, and other issues that they face, women who had abortions can become more self-destructive, so they may seek out abusive relationships as a form of self-punishment,” he said.

Because of this high rate, abortionists “should consider the possibility that women seeking termination of pregnancy may be experiencing intimate partner violence,” the study's five authors wrote.
Harvey said, “The take away from this meta-analysis is the cry for help – the willingness and desire these women have to escape violent relationships and the need for clinics to put patients over profits and help these women at risk, rather than merely taking their money and returning them to their abusers.”

Click "like" if you want to end abortion! 


Susan Bewley, a consultant obstetrician at King's College in London and one of the study's authors, found that abortion-minded women "welcomed the opportunity to disclose their experiences ... and to be offered help." She even suggested that abortion facilities "represent an appropriate setting in which to test interventions designed to reduce intimate partner violence."

But pro-lifers did not hold out any hope that the billion-dollar abortion industry will change its ways.
“If anyone thinks that abortionists might be willing to intervene on behalf of these women, they are sadly mistaken,” Sullenger said. “Abortionists are more likely to cover up for the abusers, as long as they can get paid for the abortion.”

Instead, the abortion industry has a history of fighting and then ignoring laws requiring abortionists to report abuse. As of January 1, Dr. Ulrich George Klopfer had to shut down his abortion facility in Indiana after failing to report the potential statutory rape of minor girls to state officials under the terms of the law. Undercover investigations have shown abortion workers telling minors how to cover up for their abusers.
Sometimes abortionists themselves are the perpetrators. In 2003, a jury convicted Arizona abortionist Brian Finkel of 24 counts of sexual abuse. Abortion employees from California to Michigan, from Oregon to Pennsylvania, and from England to Ghana have been convicted or accused of sexually abusing women during the abortion procedure.

“This kind of violence against women is an unfortunate consequence of abortion on demand,” Sullenger told LifeSiteNews. “It ironically robs many abused women of their 'choice' to keep their babies, and perhaps that is why domestic violence against pregnant women seems to be a low priority for the 'abortion-rights' movement.”

Cómo luchar contra la pobreza – y vencerla

Jennifer A. Marshall

Cuando el presidente Johnson inició la “Guerra contra la Pobreza” el 8 de enero de 1964, prometió “no sólo aliviar los síntomas de la pobreza, sino curarla y, sobre todo, prevenirla”. Por desgracia, el medio siglo de legado de la “Gran Sociedad” de Johnson no ha estado a la altura de ese noble objetivo.

La “Guerra contra la Pobreza” no le ha hecho justicia a los pobres. Nuestra responsabilidad con el prójimo en situación de necesidad exige más: corregir la dirección de las normativas púbicas y un compromiso por parte de cada uno de nosotros para hacer lo que podamos en nuestras propias comunidades.

A pesar de gastar cerca de $20 billones desde que empezó la “Guerra contra la Pobreza”, el índice de pobreza sigue estando hoy en día casi tan alto como a mediados de los 60. En la actualidad, el gobierno gasta anualmente cerca de $1 billón en 80 programas federales de ayuda según ingresos que proporcionan dinero, alimentos, vivienda, atención médica y servicios sociales enfocados en los americanos pobres y con bajos ingresos. Pero evidentemente, los responsables políticos no se pueden esconder detrás de montones de programas y miles de millones en gasto y afirmar que han cumplido con sus obligaciones con los pobres. Las buenas intenciones no bastan.

Necesitamos cambiar el carácter de las ayudas públicas. Eso significa modificar el objetivo de los incentivos de los programas federales de asistencia social. “A veces esos incentivos fomentan la dependencia, incluso durante generaciones”, indicó Robert L. Woodson, fundador y presidente del Centro Neighborhood Enterprise, en su testimonio del año pasado ante el Comité de Presupuesto del Senado. Woodson conoce de primera mano los efectos de estos programas, ya que trabaja con responsables comunitarios de todo el país con el objetivo de facultar a quienes están en situación de necesidad para que puedan vencer a la adversidad.

Por otro lado, el tipo correcto de incentivos puede “ayudar a la gente para que adquiera responsabilidades personales y persiga sus sueños”, observa Woodson. Transformar esos incentivos para fomentar la responsabilidad personal tiene un efecto espectacular: después de que la reforma de la asistencia social de 1996 comenzara a exigir que los beneficiarios trabajasen o se preparasen para trabajar, el número de inscritos en la asistencia social cayó a menos de la mitad, mientras que los índices de pobreza entre madres solteras y niños negros cayeron hasta mínimos históricos. Pero aquella reforma modificó los incentivos de solo uno de los más de 80 programas federales de asistencia social.

Como concluye Woodson:
 
De modo que si queremos ayudar a quienes están en situación de necesidad, tenemos que preguntarnos: ¿El enfoque que estamos adoptando para paliar la pobreza, por lo que lo llamamos red de seguridad, está ayudando realmente o está siendo perjudicial esta mano amiga?

Además de promover el trabajo, cualquier iniciativa seria en nombre de quienes están en situación de necesidad debe tomarse en serio el restablecer el matrimonio como la mejor arma de Estados Unidos contra la pobreza infantil. Los hijos nacidos y criados fuera del matrimonio tienen más de cinco veces más probabilidades de sufrir la pobreza que sus coetáneos criados en familias intactas.

Cuando comenzó la “Guerra contra la Pobreza”, el 8% de los niños de Estados Unidos nacía fuera del matrimonio. Desde mediados de los años 60, el fenómeno de tener hijos sin estar casados se ha disparado hasta más del 40% de todos los nacimientos; y desde el 25% hasta el 73% en el caso de los niños negros. Recuerde, un niño nacido y criado fuera del matrimonio tiene más de cinco veces más probabilidades de sufrir la pobreza que un niño criado en una familia intacta.

Volver a forjar una cultura del matrimonio necesita una reforma normativa con el fin de reducir las penalizaciones que sufre el matrimonio en los programas de asistencia social. También exige un tipo de restablecimiento de las relaciones que debe ocurrir a nivel personal, mediante la labor de las iglesias y de iniciativas comunitarias como “First Things First”, en Chattanooga, TN, que forja las habilidades necesarias para una relación. Estas y otras iniciativas para vencer la pobreza deberían hacer que nos involucráramos personalmente en el empeño de ayudar a restaurar vidas, familias y comunidades.

Fomentar el trabajo y restablecer el matrimonio “serían un mejor plan de batalla para erradicar la pobreza de Estados Unidos que gastar más dinero en programas fallidos”, comenta el investigador sénior de la Fundación Heritage Robert Rector en el Wall Street Journal de hoy, “Y ayudaría a alcanzar el objetivo de Lyndon B. Johnson de ‘sustituir su desesperación por la oportunidad’”.

Media Omits climate change mission of Antarctica rescued group!!!....while Gore and Climate Change CEO's are running loose...and the GOP to sopport and attend March for Life!

Mainstream Media Omits Climate Change Mission from Antarctica Ship Rescue

by Frances Martel 6 Jan 2014 314 post a comment

Global warming experts adrift in Antarctica since Christmas have finally been rescued, as the valiant efforts to save the Russian ship Akademik Shokalskiy were documented throughout the mainstream media. 

Yet one major detail – what the ship was doing in Antarctica at all – seems to have eluded almost every major media outlet.

Breitbart News previously reported that the New York Times's account of how the Russian ship was finally freed from a large chunk of ice after attempts by a Chinese icebreaker failed mysteriously omitted the original purpose of having 25 professors on board a ship in Antarctica in the first place.
However, the Times was not anywhere near alone in covering only the details of the rescue without any look into why the crew needed rescuing.

CNN's earlier reports on the ship coincide with this week's news that the crew on the ship was finally saved by an American icebreaker ship, both mentioning that the crew onboard the Akademik Shokalskiy were, indeed, "on a climate change research ship." It stands out among media sources in pointing this out. The Associated Press, for example, mentions only that the Akademik Shokalskiy was a "research ship." The Washington Post version of the AP story claims the ship was in Antarctica "re-creating Australian explorer Douglas Mawson’s 1911-13 voyage to Antarctica." NBC News went with this story, too, as did Reuters – omitting any mention of climate change research. ABC News went with no mention of any motive for the ship's being down in the Antarctic at all.

Not every media outlet merely reported a straight story without that key fact; some attempted to find new angles to the story that distracted from the purpose of the voyage and the tragedy that befell it – during Antarctica's summertime, no less – and the terrible optics these implied for the climate change lobby. USA Today, for example, wondered whether there would be any impact on the Antarctic tourist cruise industry thanks to the media's covering a ship stuck in the region (it concluded that no, no cruise companies seem to be worrying about this). National Geographic went with the very bizarre twist of emphasizing the American rescue ship's horsepower compared both to the Russian ship and its initial Chinese icebreaker savior, admiring the sheer power to break ice of such a ship.

Only publications with "conservative" reputations like the New York Post and the Boston Herald addressed the climate change angle of the story. The Herald ran an editorial hoping that the incident would increase awareness of the continued growth of Antarctica's polar ice caps, a fact contrary to much global warming speculation. The Post also mentioned the record-breaking ice in Antarctica's summer and highlighted the ship's goal to document the hypothetical record-breaking melting the scientists expected to find.
The Akademik Shokalskiy first sent out its distress call that it was stuck in ice on Christmas morning and has been lodged there ever since until finally having its passengers saved this week. The Snow Dragon, a Chinese icebreaker, moved closer to the Akademik Shokalskiy but, rather than managing to break a path through which it could escape, the icebreaker got stuck itself. A helicopter the ship brought with it did manage to take some passengers out of the Akademik Shokalskiy before the full rescue. An American vessel, the Polar Star, arrived this week from Australia and is in the process of returning the passengers to Tasmania, where they are expected by mid-January. The ships themselves remain lodged in ice.

Climate Change Groups Seek New Leadership as Green Movement Loses Momentum

by Robert Wilde 6 Jan 2014 230 post a comment

It is unclear exactly why many climate change organizations are installing new executives, but it appears they are following the professional sports paradigm: When a team loses more than it wins, you can’t fire all the players, but you can fire the coach.

In the last decade the environmentalist have peddled harsh laws to install climate change strategies. However, many of these laws don’t pass, and new regulations fail to get traction. With global warming at a standstill for most of the last two decades and – much to Al Gore’s chagrin – plenty of ice still on the polar caps, more green groups are firing their CEO’s.Next to go is Maggie Fox, president and CEO of the Al Gore-founded Climate Reality Project, who will be gone in the Spring. The group was previously called the Alliance for Climate Protection and was part of the unsuccessful environmental movement’s drive to enact cap-and-trade legislation in 2009-10.

Two other large U.S. environmental companies are giving the boot to their leaders. National Wildlife Federation President and CEO Larry Schweiger is leaving in May, and Natural Resources Defense Council President Frances Beinecke is also parting ways with his group in 2014.

Frank O'Donnell, president of Clean Air Watch, defended the changing of the guard. "It happens in every profession," he said; "An older generation gives way to a new one. In this case, a new generation of leaders needs to step up." However, this logic doesn’t fully explain why Greenpeace USA is canning Executive Director Phil Radford who is only in his late 30s, a clear member of that younger generation.

Republicans throw weight behind March for Life: RNC delays annual meeting so members can attend

by Dustin Siggins

• Mon Jan 06, 2014 18:58 EST

WASHINGTON, D.C., January 6, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – In a move that boosts social conservatives in an election year, the Chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC) has announced that he is delaying the RNC's annual winter meeting so he and others can attend the March for Life.
The Washington Times reports that approximately 20 of the 168 members of the RNC were planning to attend the March before Preibus' announcement. With Preibus' backing, the RNC is now renting buses to take attendees from downtown D.C. to the March, which takes place on Capitol Hill.

Hundreds of thousands

“I saw that there was a real interest among a significant portion of our members to attend and support the Rally for Life,” Priebus said in an email to The Times. “This is a core principle of our party. It was natural for me to support our members and our principles.”

The Republican Party has faced infighting between fiscal and social conservatives for several years. But despite this, according to RNC Deputy Press Secretary Raffi Williams, observers should not be surprised by the Chairman's decision. “The Republican Party will always be home for Americans who believe in social conservative issues,” he told LifeSiteNews.com in an e-mail.

This is the first time in years that the RNC has had its winter meeting in D.C. The meeting will now be delayed by a few hours on the first day. Williams said that “[the RNC] thought it only fitting for our members to attend the March to take part in the fight for the unborn.” The meeting will last four days.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE! 


The Times cited several members of the RNC who were influential in Preibus’s decision. Missouri GOP Chairman Ed Martin said that “[w]hen Reince got wind of what members were planning on their own, he emailed that he would shift our RNC schedule so we could attend...” Oklahoma member Carolyn McLarty said the change has its origins in an e-mail RNC member Kathy Hayden of Virginia sent to attendees about the March “about a week ago.” “Things have snowballed from there,” she said.

In a public statement, March for Life President Jeanne Monahan said her organization was “pleased that...Chairman Reince Priebus recognizes the importance of the life issue and has given it priority in the Committee's calendar.” She encouraged attendees “to show their support for life, and in particular for adoption, the theme of this year's event.” 


The March for Life has taken place for 40 years, typically on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade. Hundreds of thousands usually participate in the annual event.

Denials, half-truths, lies, deception, frustration, ...

NYT Denies It Received White House Leaks Despite Evidence to Contrary

---

by Tony Lee 

“The notion that my White House would purposely release classified national security information is offensive,” President Barack Obama said at a press conference Friday in reference to two New York Times stories.

The first dealt with White House “Kill Lists,” while the second concerned America’s creation of the “stuxnet” virus that helped disable an Iranian nuclear plant from enriching uranium -- in which sensitive national security information was leaked in what Republicans have said were “some of the most serious breaches of national security in recent memory.” 

Dean Baquet, the Managing Editor of the New York Times, told Politico  “I can’t believe anybody who says these are leaks ... Read those stories. They are so clearly the product of tons and tons of reporting.”

Attorney General Eric Holder, unlike in the “Fast and the Furious” case, was pressured to assign two lawyers from the Department of Justice to investigate the matter.

But closer examinations of the stories in question -- and the White House’s actions -- point to the White House as the very source of these leaks. And, as White House critics have asserted, the Obama administration may have leaked the information to boost Obama’s image as a strong leader, playing up the national security card to give him cover for America’s slumping economy. 

In the New York Times story in question on Obama’s “Kill List” and drone strikes, every source in that story is affiliated with the Obama administration.

And in the New York Times article that revealed the United States co-authored the Stuxnet virus, the story reveals intimate details from meetings in the White House’s Situation Room and paints Obama as the central figure who ultimately decided to continue to the program (the implication is Obama made a critical decision that led to a successful intelligence outcome), which succeeded, after the virus became public in 2010 and administration officials were deciding whether the program was worth continuing.

Compare the White House’s lack of an immediate response to leaks favorable to them to their aggressive response to leaked information that detailed a failed intelligence mission in Iran. READ MORE



Reach Out to COLOMBIA.... We prepare everything for your BUSINESS or PLEASURE trip

GATTACA becomes reality as scientists screen, abort human babies based on 3,500 ‘genetic faults’

Ethan A. Huff
Infowars.com
June 11, 2012
The popular 1997 science fiction film Gattaca portrays a futuristic world in which human beings genetically engineered (GE) with certain desirable and superior genetic traits are given preference to natural-born human beings who are considered inferior. And in just 15 years since the release of the film, this scenario has become a reality, as modern science has come up with a new way to test unborn babies for roughly 3,500 so-called genetic “defects.”
The U.K.’s Telegraph reports that a team of researchers from the University of Washington (UW) in Seattle has contrived a method of examining the genetic code of unborn babies via blood samples taken from their mothers, and saliva samples taken from their fathers. The tiny amounts of free-floating DNA present in both samples allow researchers to essentially map the entire genetic code of unborn babies and determine which genetic traits they will have upon birth.
Some babies are born naturally with “de novo” mutations, which are said to be linked to genetic defects such as Down syndrome and cystic fibrosis. These mutations are typically not passed down from parents to their children, and are instead acquired in some other way, including potentially through vaccinations and toxic environmental exposures.
In 39 out of 44 tested cases, the UW researchers were able to accurately pinpoint prior to birth de novo mutations that would occur in babies after birth. And as the technology becomes widely available to parents in the near future, the ghastly scenario depicted in the movieGattacawill evolve into an ever-present reality where the only unborn babies permitted to live and thrive will be those with “superior” genetic makeups.
“This work opens up the possibility that we will be able to scan the whole genome of the fetus for more than 3,000 single-gene disorders through a single, non-invasive test,” said Dr. Jay Shendure, lead scientist for the research published in the journal . His entire team, however, corporately added that “incorporating this level of information into prenatal decision-making raises many ethical questions that must be considered carefully within the scientific community and on a societal level.”
Genetic screening will lead to more abortions, more eugenics, and a culture of genetic class suppression
When science starts openly tampering with human life based on subjective perceptions of which genetic traits are desirable and which are not desirable, there is no stopping the pandora’s box of population control techniques that will surely ensue. Parents seeking the “perfect” child, for instance, will be more likely to simply abort a child with genetic “errors” and keep trying until they get the one they want. READ MORE

¿Por qué es América excepcional?

Dr. Matthew Spalding

En 1776, cuando Estados Unidos anunció su independencia como nación, estaba compuesto por trece colonias rodeadas de potencias hostiles.

Hoy, Estados Unidos es un país con cincuenta estados que cubren un extenso continente. Sus fuerzas militares son las más poderosas del mundo. Su economía produce casi una cuarta parte de la riqueza del mundo. El pueblo americano está entre los más trabajadores, píos, afluentes y generosos del mundo.
¿Es América excepcional?

Cada nación adquiere significado y razón de ser a partir de un cierta cualidad unificadora – un carácter étnico, una religión común, una historia compartida. Estados Unidos es distinto. América fue fundada en un momento especial, por gente especial, partiendo de unos principios especiales acerca del hombre, la libertad y el gobierno constitucional.
La Revolución Americana hizo uso de antiguas ideas. Estados Unidos es el producto de la civilización occidental, moldeado por la cultura judeocristiana y las libertades políticas heredadas de Gran Bretaña.
No obstante, fundar Estados Unidos también fue revolucionario. No en el sentido de sustituir a un grupo de gobernantes por otro o de provocar la caída de las instituciones de la sociedad, sino de poner la autoridad política en manos del pueblo.
Como el escritor inglés G.K. Chesterton genialmente indicó: “América es la única nación del mundo que se ha fundado sobre un credo”. Ese credo se formula claramente en la Declaración de Independencia con la que las colonias americanas anunciaron su separación de Gran Bretaña. La Declaración es una imperecedera afirmación de derechos inherentes, de los propósitos adecuados del gobierno y de los límites de la autoridad política.
Los fundadores americanos apelaron a verdades evidentes, que derivan de las “Leyes de la Naturaleza y de la Naturaleza de Dios”, para justificar su libertad. Es un estándar universal y permanente. Estas verdades no son exclusividad de América sino que son aplicables a todos los hombres y mujeres en el mundo entero. Son tan ciertas hoy como en 1776. LEER COMPLETO

Envia Dineros de COLOMBIA A USA

Wayuu Purse...!