Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta youth. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta youth. Mostrar todas las entradas

jueves, 12 de febrero de 2015

Hey Youth! what's the ISIS Attraction?....Why isn't natural family planning being prescribed?...Reducir la Pobreza = Mas Libertad Económica

American Youth And ISIS: What’s The Attraction?

Posted: January 06, 2015
Printer-friendly version
2014 witnessed the rise of a new terror group, a group that has made its name through brutality manifested by graphic, videotaped beheadings of westerners.  Ironically, some of its recruits are increasingly coming from the West, and surprisingly, some of these are American youth.  A trio of adolescent girls from Colorado, a 19-year-old convert to Islam, and a suburban Chicago teen were all planning to leave the U.S. and join ISIS.  FBI investigators have discovered a network of online recruiters who are providing information on how to make the trek.  What begs understanding, is why youth would be attracted to making such a journey to join forces with an extreme ideology bent on vindictive violence.  One helpful perspective for understanding such motivation comes from the study of cults more generally.

Religion, Cults, And Teens

The psychology of why young people are drawn to what might objectively be seen as extreme and unrealistic views of the world has been studied for some time.  Adolescence is the quintessential time of identity formation and discovery of who one was created to be.  Thus, for most, if not all, it is a time when established societal values are critiqued, different philosophies of life are explored, and insecurities about belonging and ‘fitting in’ abound.  During adolescence, higher-order thinking skills become engaged and open youth to new intellectual and spiritual ideas.  At the same time, given that the world for adolescents can often seem unpredictable, and uncontrollable, feelings of vulnerability are not uncommon.

For most adolescents, parents and friends, school, or civic clubs and organizations provide the necessary tethers to allow them time to sort through these feelings.  However, when a young person feels alienated from those family or friends who should form his primary support group, for whatever reason – divorce, child abuse, bullying, cultural differences with peers, absence of extended family – he will naturally seek to find his niche elsewhere.  While this searching usually takes the form of standard ‘adolescent rebellion,’ there are times when relief from a much deeper sense of disconnectedness is sought, relief which is seemingly afforded by the communality of a cult and an oftentimes-charismatic cult leader, who offers a vision, albeit a false one, of a perfect society.  Religious cults, in particular, provide a natural venue for this search because of the promise of meaning and fulfillment they offer which stands in stark contrast to the increasingly-vacant secularism of our society today.

ISIS’ (ironic) Post-Modern Approach

Despite ISIS’ apparent goal of the return of the Caliphate from centuries past, its tactics are quite modern.  Amidst all of the “sturm und drang” that American youth experience, ISIS has capitalized on the availability and saturation of social media to blanket the world with its “promise” of bringing meaning and purpose to life.  Our post-modern world of rampant secularism has separated many families and their children from the religious values and traditions of Western Civilization which historically have been a bulwark during the oftentimes stormy search for identity in one’s life.  Nature abhors a vacuum, it is said.  So while some desperate youth choose drug abuse or even attempt suicide in a search for meaning, or relief, for others, the rugged, clear, and focused message of radical Islam provides the desired clarity.

A Timeless Remedy

What youth need today is essentially the same as what they have always needed: loving family relationships characterized by a firmness and flexibility that allows them to explore the world and their emerging sense of self, but within boundaries and with the guidance of those entrusted with their care.  Meaningful friendships also provide needed feedback and consolation for youth as they navigate their way into the adult world.  Sadly, some youth are not afforded these gifts, and without proper guidance and understanding, are susceptible to believing the propaganda and indoctrination that cults provide. 

I suppose every generation can stake some claim to the notion that its road was the most difficult to travel.  Youth today are surrounded by modern conveniences and technology which were unimaginable just decades ago.  Yet, one thing that youth in centuries past more likely had was family, and a local community that afforded them clear definitions of what was important in life and supportive others surrounding them to provide guidance.  That is greatly lacking today.  And its absence has consequences.
 Wayuu Bags
Natural family planning, theology of the body – the Church's 'best-kept secrets'
4K
58
2
4K
Michelangelo's The Creation of Eve, from the Sistine Chapel ceiling, c. 1510.
Michelangelo's The Creation of Eve, from the Sistine Chapel ceiling, c. 1510.










.- If you ask Archbishop Aquila, theology of the body and natural family planning – both practical resources on human sexuality – may be the Church’s best-kept secrets.

“The truth is, the Church has many positive things to say about the gift of our sexuality,” Archbishop Samuel Aquila of Denver said Feb. 8 at a dinner for teachers of natural family planning.

'Theology of the Body' is the corpus of 129 General Audience addresses delivered by St. John Paul II from 1979 to 1984, regarding the human person and human sexuality.

The heart of these teachings is the sacramental view of reality on human sexuality, Archbishop Aquila said, meaning that human bodies have a language that reveals something about the mystery of God’s inner life.

Archbishop Aquila believes the importance of Theology of the Body and the positive impact of natural family planning are foundational pillars to understand how Christ redeemed human sexuality after the fall of Adam and Eve.

“What makes Theology of the Body unique is that it brings true joy to relationships, marriages and friendships,” the archbishop noted, saying that without Theology of the Body, natural family planning can become “a kind of Catholic contraception, something which is really a contradiction in terms.”

“If you desire to experience and impart the joy and beauty of natural family planning, then you must understand the Theology of the Body,” Archbishop Aquila stated, saying that both of these resources are “one of the best-kept secrets of the Catholic Church.”

Looking at the past 40 years, the archbishop pointed to the abuse of power, loss of respect, and the belief that man has unlimited dominion over his own body as some of the causes for today’s societal sexual meltdown.

“We have seen an increase in infidelity, a surge in divorce, more dysfunctional families, a decrease in children’s psychological well-being and a boom in single-parent households,” Archbishop Aquila noted, pointing to the sexual revolution of the 60s and 70s as the culprit in the rejection of Christian sexual values.

Great numbers of people find themselves dissatisfied with the culture of meaningless sex and objectification, he noted, saying that a manifestation of this can be seen in the upcoming film ‘50 Shades of Gray.’

“We were created and called into being to love and be loved, not to be used, not to be an object for someone else’s fantasy,” the archbishop noted.

Although the modern-day understanding of sexuality points to self-gratification, rather than self-giving, Archbishop Aquila called for a return to the mutual love and respect that men and women should have for each other.

 “When a couple’s relationship is characterized by a love that is free, total, faithful and fruitful, then they are able to experience the joy God intended for them and so reflect God’s love to the world,” he said, emphasizing the importance of both natural family planning and Theology of the Body for couples and their understanding of sexuality.

However, when a couple uses contraception, they contradict this message of total self-giving, he stated.

“They say rather, ‘I give you part of myself, but I also deliberately withhold part of myself,’” Archbishop Aquila noted, believing that this is why the use of contraception is deceptive.

“As loudly and as persistently as our disbelieving culture proclaims its view of sex and happiness, a simple look around reveals the sad truth: too many people are left alone in the dark, searching for and failing to find love.”

While the secular approach to sexuality promotes objectification of the person, the archbishop believes that the Church views sexuality as the ultimate exchange of love in self-gift.

“We need to proclaim even louder and more persistently: God has the best, richest, and fullest plan for the happiness of married couples,” he went on to say.

“Love is a Person, and He has written a wonderful design for human love into each of our bodies and hearts.”

Cómo la libertad económica reduce la pobreza

Puntos destacados del Indice 2015 de Libertad EconomicaSuponga que alguien le dijera que hay más de dos décadas de datos económicos que muestran el secreto del éxito para todas las naciones del mundo y que un premio Nobel de Economía inspiró la metodología que se utilizó para analizar los datos.
¿Se sentaría a escuchar?
Espero que sí, porque si lo hiciera, Ud. descubriría mucho sobre por qué algunas economías tienen éxito mientras otras fracasan.
El estudio es el Índice de Libertad Económica de laFundación Heritage y el Wall Street Journal. El premio Nobel al que me refería es el mundialmente famoso economista Milton Friedman. El Índice 2015, editado por Terry Miller y Anthony B. Kim, muestra que altos niveles de libertad económica producen todo tipo de beneficios. La libertad económica es el grado en el que una economía está libre de la interferencia del gobierno y de regulación, ambas supresoras del crecimiento económico.
Uno de esos beneficios es la reducción de la pobreza. Año tras año, el Índicedemuestra que los países económicamente libres superan a los demás en la reducción de la pobreza. El Índice demuestra que la intensidad de la pobreza en los países cuyas economías son mayormente libres o moderadamente libres es sólo alrededor de un cuarto del nivel encontrado en países con economías menos libres. La intensidad de la pobreza se mide en cuán severamente sufren las personas debido a bajos estándares de vida, es decir, la falta de servicios básicos como la atención médica y la educación.
Claramente, el peor lugar para ser pobre es un país económicamente reprimido como Bielorrusia, Venezuela, Corea del Norte o Zimbabue. No sólo hay poca o ninguna posibilidad de escalar socialmente sino que la pobreza es definitivamente aplastante.
A los críticos de las economías capitalistas les gusta quejarse de la desigualdad o de no poder escalar socialmente, pero nunca preguntan “comparado con qué?”. Los países con escasa libertad económica son a menudo económicamente estratificados y pobres. Las naciones que son económicamente más libres tienen mayores ingresos per cápita que aquellos con puntajes de libertad económica más bajos. Esto significa que las naciones económicamente libres tienen niveles de vida más altos.
Index 2015 - Grafico 3
Al mismo tiempo, la desigualdad es alta en Grecia, Argentina, Rusia, India y otros países económicamente controlados. Incluso en países comunistas como Cuba, que aparentemente se supone ser un paraíso para los trabajadores, existe una grave desigualdad entre las élites de los partidos políticos y el resto de la población.
Milton y Rose Friedman tenían una interesante opinión sobre cómo la libertad económica está relacionada con el poder escalar socialmente. Decían que “siempre y cuando se mantenga la libertad, eso evitará la institucionalización de las posiciones de privilegio. La libertad significa diversidad, pero también poder escalar socialmente. Resguarda la oportunidad de que los desfavorecidos de hoy se conviertan en los privilegiados de mañana y, en el proceso, permite a casi todo el mundo, de arriba a abajo, disfrutar de una vida más plena y más rica”.
De hecho, se mida como se mida el desarrollo humano, la libertad económica produce mejores resultados. La esperanza de vida es más alta, las tasas de alfabetización son más altas y las oportunidades de educación son mejores en los países que adoptan la libertad económica. Si Ud. desea todas estas cosas, es mucho mejor vivir en países con economías relativamente libres como EE.UU., Chile, Suiza o Taiwán que vivir en Grecia, Indonesia, Brasil o Venezuela, que son economías mayormente controladas o reprimidas.
Si Ud. replica que eso se debe a que esos países son simplemente más ricos, está dejando de lado la pregunta de por qué son ricos. No son los recursos naturales los que hacen ricas a las sociedades como Suiza, Taiwán, Chile o Singapur. Es la libertad económica. El Índice de Libertad Económica ha mostrado consistentemente con el paso de los años la sólida relación entre mejorar la libertad económica y lograr un mayor crecimiento económico per cápita. No es simplemente una marea creciente que eleva a todos los barcos. Es también el reflejo de una economía más dinámica, flexible y abierta a ideas y tecnologías.
Si estas ideas son lo suficientemente buenas para países prósperos como EE.UU., Australia y Suiza –por no hablar de exitosas empresas como Apple– ¿por qué no van a ser buenas para países en desarrollo que quieran ser ricos?
Por supuesto que son lo suficientemente buenas, no sólo porque funcionan con los ricos, sino porque también funcionan con todo el mundo.
Indice 2015 - Clasificacion

domingo, 30 de junio de 2013

Then we ask: why GOD?...Peligra el estado Laico si hablamos de nuestra fe?....Democrats and Infanticide!

DOJ Defunds Youth Programs that Reference God



The Department of Justice has summarily removed federal funding from two Louisiana youth programs because a local official refused to sign a pledge stating he would require the programs to ban mentions of God.

Julian Whittington, the sheriff of Bossier Parish, LA, told Fox News that Obama's Justice Office of Civil Rights de-funded the Young Marines chapter and another youth program over mentions of religion. In the case of the Young Marine program, chartered in 1965, the funding was cut off because the group features an oath that mentions "God." In the other case, it was because a program for at-risk youth featured a voluntary, student-led prayer session as one of its activities.
Sheriff Whittington says that the DOJ withdrew a combined $30,000 from the programs because the groups refused to remove God from their activities. The sheriff said this was evidence of the government's "aggression and infringement of our religious freedoms."
Whittington told Fox, "We were informed that these are unacceptable, inherently religious activities and the Department of Justice would not be able to fund the programs if it continued. They wanted a letter from me stating that I would no longer have voluntary prayer and I would also have to remove ‘God’ from the Young Marine’s oath."
The oath from the Young Marine organization reads:
From this day forward, I sincerely promise, I will set an example for all other youth to follow and I shall never do anything that would bring disgrace or dishonor upon God, my Country and its flag, my parents, myself or the Young Marines. These I will honor and respect in a manner that will reflect credit upon them and myself. Semper Fidelis
Both the U.S. Army enlistment oath and its commissioning oath end with "so help me God."
As to the at-risk youth program, Whittington said,"We're not promoting any specific religion, this is just voluntary prayer, mention of God, how offensive and bad can that be?"
In response to the DOJ’s message insisting that he sign the anti-God pledge, Sheriff Whittington sent a letter of his own to LA Governor Bobby Jindal.
"As a Christian, Sheriff and American citizen, I am writing to express my frustration and concern over the persistent aggression and infringement of our religious freedoms which have been imposed upon the law enforcement grant programs, specifically related to the Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement,” wrote the Sheriff.
In cutting off the funding, the DOJ claimed it was a violation of Church and State rules for the government to fund any group that mentions God.
Fox's Todd Starnes says that, "Both youth programs have been hailed as a successful way to reach at-risk young people. Since 2002 more than 1,000 young people have graduated from the program, directed by a Bossier Parish deputy who is a former U.S. Marine."
Like Sheriff Whittington, Rep. John Fleming (R-LA) was troubled by the DOJ's actions.
"There is a very wide effort coming out of the administration that seeks to stamp out freedom of expressions – particularly religion and especially freedom of Christian expression," Fleming said. "They are willing to throw the youth overboard and remove the funding just in the name of making this an atheist, agnostic, secular organization."
"They (DOJ) don’t want anything to have any sort of religious support – even down to prayer," Fleming said. "It’s sad and it’s inconsistent with the intentions of the framers of the Constitution."
Sheriff Whittington is not taking this lying down. "When something is not right and you know it’s not right and you keep bowing down, nothing is ever going to change," he said.


¿Peligra el Estado laico?

Cuando las autoridades expresan su fe en los actos públicos

San Cristóbal de las Casas, (Zenit.org) Felipe Arizmendi Esquivel

SITUACIONES

Por el hecho de que algunas autoridades municipales y estatales, católicas y protestantes, han expresado en actos públicos su fe cristiana, confiando su territorio al reinado de Jesucristo, de inmediato han surgido voces de alerta, diciendo que se violaron las leyes, que estos son intentos de dar marcha atrás a la laicidad oficial, que son muestras de incapacidad de esas autoridades para gobernar y que se les debiera hacer un juicio político para destituirles. No les pareció bien que el Presidente de la República se haya hecho presente al inicio del ministerio del Papa Francisco, porque alegan que eso es no respetar el carácter laico del Estado.
Estamos en fin de cursos en las escuelas, privadas y públicas. Muchos nos solicitan una Misa de acción de gracias, sobre todo quienes terminan una etapa, desde kínder hasta universidad. La piden los alumnos, los mismos maestros o los padres de familia. ¿Esto es contrario al laicismo de artículo tercero constitucional, en que se afirma que la educación pública debe ser laica?

En varias comunidades, no sólo indígenas, cuando una autoridad civil va a iniciar su cargo, es costumbre que participe en una celebración religiosa en forma oficial, no privada. En otros países, juramentan sobre la Biblia, van a un Te Deum en las fiestas nacionales, o manifiestan su fe religiosa, y nadie se extraña por ello.

ILUMINACION

¿Qué pasa en nuestro país? Las leyes sobre la materia son bastante restrictivas. Dice la Ley de Asociaciones Religiosas y Culto Público: “Las autoridades federales, estatales y municipales no podrán asistir con carácter oficial a ningún acto religioso de culto público, ni a actividad que tenga motivos o propósitos similares” (Art. 25). Y su respectivo Reglamento: “Se exceptúa de lo previsto en el párrafo anterior, al servidor público que asista a título personal a los actos religiosos de culto público o actividades que tengan motivos o propósitos similares. En dichos actos o actividades, el servidor público en ningún momento podrá ostentarse o hacer manifiesto su carácter oficial, ni actuar en el ejercicio de las atribuciones que legalmente le corresponden. En caso de incumplimiento a lo dispuesto en este artículo, el servidor público de que se trata, será sujeto de las responsabilidades y sanciones previstas en las leyes aplicables” (Art. 28).

Se acaba de aprobar, después de varias inexplicables resistencias, esta reforma al artículo 24 de nuestra Constitución: “Toda persona tiene derecho a la libertad de convicciones éticas, de conciencia y de religión, y a tener o adoptar, en su caso, la de su agrado. Esta libertad incluye el derecho de participar, individual o colectivamente, tanto en público como en privado, en las ceremonias, devociones o actos del culto respectivo, siempre que no constituyan un delito o falta penados por la ley. Nadie podrá utilizar los actos públicos de expresión de esta libertad con fines políticos, de proselitismo o de propaganda política”.

Esto no es nuevo, sino apenas la aplicación de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos, firmada en 1948, que en su artículo 18 establece: “Toda persona tiene derecho a la libertad de pensamiento, de conciencia y de religión; este derecho incluye la libertad de cambiar de religión o de creencia, así como la libertad de manifestar su religión o su creencia, individual y colectivamente, tanto en público como en privado, por la enseñanza, la práctica, el culto y la observancia”.

En esta Declaración de la ONU, ratificada por nuestro país, no se hace restricción alguna para que las autoridades civiles manifiesten su propia fe, en público y en privado.

COMPROMISOS

Ya es tiempo de poner nuestras leyes más acordes con los tratados internacionales, y no seguir haciendo una dicotomía entre la vida pública y la privada en las autoridades. Esa distinción es una ficción legal; en la práctica, no es posible separarlas. Lo que no debe permitirse es usar la religión con fines partidistas, pues los partidos parten y dividen a los pueblos; la Iglesia está para unir a los que están partidos y divididos.


Cruz: Democrats Don't Care About Infanticide



Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) denounced Democrats for not caring about infanticide in a speech to the National Right to Life convention on Friday in Texas. 

According to LifeNews, Cruz said Senate Democrats do not think abortionists who kill born-alive babies like Kermit Gosnell and Douglas Kerpen, a late-term abortion doctor in Houston, are doing anything wrong.
Cruz said he was proud to support a bill in the Senate that would ban abortions after 20 weeks, which did not make it to the floor, and compared his fight in the Senate to the fight to ban such abortions in Texas, which Democrats, led by State Senator Wendy Davis filibustered last week. Republican Texas Gov. Rick Perry has called another special session on Monday in order to get the bill passed.

“Democrats stood together embracing the policy of abortion no matter what the consequences,” Cruz said, according to LifeNews. “When Austin Democrats filibustered, they were filibustering to protect late-term abortions.”
He blasted Senate Democrats for defending abortions up until birth and not taking Gosnell's clinic--and others like it--seriously.
He said Senate Democrats wanted a resolution that condemned unsanitary health clinics," but were only "fine with any resolution as long as it didn’t mention abortion. A clinic passing on a disease in their minds is morally equivalent to Gosnell killing babies outside their mothers womb.”
Cruz said he was also proud that Texas "led the states" while he was Solicitor General on banning partial-birth abortions and "applauded the courts for defending Texas’ right to de-fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business."

Cruz reportedly also spoke about forced abortions in China and "lamented that pro-abortion groups don’t speak up more against the grisly practice that has killed millions of babies in China." He also "bashed President Barack Obama for repeatedly voting against the Born Alive bill in Illinois, which would stop infanticides."
He then "condemned news outlets that ignored Gosnell" and thanked pro-life advocates for not only pressuring the mainstream media to cover the Gosnell trial but to fight for pro-life causes "despite the ridicule of the mainstream media."
“Without life there is no liberty, there is no pursuit of happiness. The ability to take life is the ultimate power and the ultimate deprivation of our God-given rights," Cruz said. “I have been honored to have the opportunity to defend life.”