Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta christmas. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta christmas. Mostrar todas las entradas

jueves, 24 de diciembre de 2015

TRUMP: "We are going to start saying Merry Christmas again"...La Familia: El mejor regalo de Navidad!...Washington's Christmas Poem!!!

Trump: ‘We Are Going to Start Saying Merry Christmas Again … That’s The Way It Should Be’

By Michael W. Chapman | December 23, 2015 | 3:04 PM EST
Donald Trump.  (AP)
Real estate mogul and best-selling author Donald Trump, echoing remarks he made in September about the importance of saying “Merry Christmas,” told Family Research Council President Tony Perkins that when you go to stores today, you rarely see the word “Christmas,” but that this is going to change – “we are going to start saying ‘Merry Christmas’ again.”
During a Dec. 19 interview on Perkins’ radio show, Washington Watch,  Trump said,  “Well, Tony, I can, tell you this, that religious liberty is very important to me, and I see more and more, especially, in particular, Christianity, Christians, their power is being taken away.”
“I just watch it and I get angry at it,” said Trump.  “You look at what is going on with other religions, you look at, as an example, what’s happening with respect to Muslims and others, where perhaps they just band together better or something. But, you know, the Christian, every year, you just see it more and more.”

“You know, you go from one thing to the next to the point where it’s not politically correct to say ‘Merry Christmas’ to anybody, or you go to stores and you don’t ever see the word ‘Christmas’ anymore,” said Trump.  “You don’t see that term anymore, Tony.”

“One of the things I always say, and I say it lightheartedly but I mean it -- it’s actually not supposed to be so lighthearted -- and I get standing ovations, especially in Iowa and certain places, is we are going to start saying ‘Merry Christmas’ again,” said Trump.
“Because you go into these stores and you don’t see anything having to do with Christmas and it’s disgraceful, frankly, as far as I’m concerned,” he said, “and that’s the way it should be and I feel strongly about it.”
During the Values Voter Summit in September, Trump said, “The word Christmas. I love Christmas. I love Christmas. You go to stores, you don’t see the word Christmas. It says ‘Happy Holidays’ all over. I say, 'Where’s Christmas?’”
“I tell my wife, ‘Don’t go to those stores. I want to see Christmas. I want to see Christmas,’” said Trump. “Other people can have their holidays but Christmas is Christmas. I want to see ‘Merry Christmas.’”
Michael W. Chapman
Michael W. Chapman
Michael W. Chapman

La familia es el mejor regalo en estas fiestas


La Navidad, la celebración por excelencia del tiempo en familia, así como el día de Año Nuevo, el momento de los buenos propósitos, proporcionan una gran oportunidad para que los padres se aseguren de que la unidad de la familia dura todo el año, con la promesa pasar más tiempo con sus hijos y sus actividades. Como han revelado décadas de investigación, cuanto más tiempo y actividades comparten las familias, más probable es que los hijos prosperen.
Desde los primeros años de vida de un niño, que la madre y el padre se involucren en el desarrollo de sus hijos prepara el camino para sus éxitos académicos. Los alumnos de prescolar cuyos padres les leen a menudo, normalmente obtienen calificaciones más altas en términos de desarrollo cognitivo. Y de promedio, aquellos niños que reciben más estimulación cognitiva en su hogar obtienen calificaciones más altas en las pruebas de inteligencia y tienen menos probabilidades de mostrar comportamientos hiperactivos o antisociales.
Además, los niños cuyos padres se involucran más con sus actividades durante su etapa en la escuela elemental tienen más probabilidades de acabar la secundaria, mientras que a su vez los adolescentes con padres más involucrados tienen más probabilidades de aspirar a una educación superior. Los niños de todas las razas y orígenes étnicos con padres más involucrados tienen más probabilidades de triunfar académicamente. Incluso la involucración paterna en simples actividades de ocio está asociada con un incremento del desempeño académico de los hijos.
Igualmente, la involucración, la comunicación y la supervisión paternas están unidas al comportamiento de los jóvenes. Los adolescentes cuyos padres hablan con ellos acerca de las normas de comportamiento sexual y monitorizan sus actividades tienen menos probabilidades de llegar a ser sexualmente activos. Además, los jóvenes cuyos padres hablan con ellos acerca de sus inquietudes y motivan sus intereses tienen menos probabilidades de mostrar problemas de comportamiento o de participar en actos de violencia. Del mismo modo, los jóvenes que cenan frecuentemente con sus familias tienen menos probabilidades de consumir drogas o alcohol.
Finalmente, la involucración de los padres está también unida al bienestar emocional de los hijos. Los jóvenes cuyos padres están presentes en casa cuando llegan de la escuela, a la hora de la cena y cuando se van a la cama tienen menos probabilidades de experimentar desórdenes emocionales, de la misma forma que aquellos cuyos padres están involucrados y se muestran receptivos tienden a tener mayor autoestima y son menos susceptibles de sucumbir ante la presión social.
La preocupación, la involucración y la comunicación paternas son regalos de un valor verdaderamente incalculable y que sólo los padres pueden ofrecer. Al mismo tiempo, se debería desarrollar normativa pública (desde iniciativas para fortalecer el matrimonio a aumentar el papel de los padres en las decisiones educativas) que fomente el papel único y esencial que los padres desempeñan en las vidas de sus hijos.
Cuando las familias se reúnan durante las próximas semanas para celebrar la Navidad y el Año Nuevo, los responsables políticos deberían recordar y honrar el programa social más eficaz de la nación: la solidez familiar. Desde la disminución del comportamiento de riesgo juvenil hasta el aumento del éxito académico de los hijos, las familias que se mantienen unidas sobre la base del matrimonio son parte esencial del mantenimiento de una sociedad civil próspera.
Posted in EstudiosFamilia y ReligiónOpiniónAnálisisActualidadDestacables,ReligiónSociedad civil
 

Collette Caprara

Washington’s Christmas Poem: ‘Assist Me to Sing the Morn, On Which the Savior of Mankind Was Born’

By Ali Meyer | December 23, 2015 | 1:28 PM EST
George Washington.  
(Public domain.)
(CNSNews.com) - George Washington, the first president of the United States and a Founding Father of our nation, was a devout Christian baptized shortly after his birth by his parents, who were members of the Church of England. 

The book, “George Washington the Christian,” by William J. Johnson  highlights Washington’s religious foundation, his prayers, his religious habits, and his actions taken as a Christian soldier.

One of the stories that Johnson recounts of a 13-year-old Washington includes some verses that he copied on Christmas Day.

“Assist me, Muse divine, to sing the Morn, on Which the Saviour of Mankind was born,” Washington said. 

“Some think that he composed poems himself, but it is more likely that he copied them from an unknown source,” Johnson explains. “It shows the manner of Christian training he had received at home. He had absorbed 'the spirit of the Day and the facts of the faith, as well as the rule and model of Christian life.'” 
“George Washington descended from a long line of excellent churchmen,” states Johnson. “If Washington’s military character was developed out of materials which came to him by inheritance from both sides of his family, so too was his religious character. That love of the church which we have seen as a distinguishing mark in his family became a strong inheritance which his own will and intelligence did not set aside.” 

Washington took those values and beliefs with him in the army and encouraged others to do the same.
According to Johnson, when Washington was told that the British troops at Lexington had fired on and killed several Americans, Washington replied, “I grieve for the death of my countrymen; but rejoice that the British are still determined to keep God on our side.”
 


The day after Washington took command of the army on July 4, 1775, he issued an order saying, “The General most earnestly requires and expects due observance of those articles of war established for the government of the army, which forbid profane cursing, swearing, and drunkenness. And in like manner he requires and expects of all officers and soldiers, not engaged in actual duty, a punctual attendance on Divine service, to implore the blessing of Heaven upon the means used for our safety and defense.” 

About a year later on July 9, 1776, Washington issued another order defining a “Christian soldier.”
It stated, “The honorable Continental Congress having been pleased to allow a chaplain to each regiment, with the pay of thirty-three dollars and one-third per month, the colonels or commanding officers of each regiment are directed to procure chaplains accordingly, persons of good characters and exemplary lives, and to see that all inferior officers and soldiers pay them a suitable respect."

"The blessing and protection of Heaven are at all times necessary, but especially so in times of public distress and danger," reads the order.  "The General hopes and trusts, that every officer and man will endeavor so to live and act as becomes a Christian soldier, defending the dearest rights and liberties of his country."
(This article was initially published on Dec. 24, 2014, by then-CNSNews.com reporter Ali Meyer.)

miércoles, 23 de diciembre de 2015

PODCAST: Christmas in America!!!...Mensaje de Navidad del FBI!...Anti-Muslim manufactured Hate-Crime "Epidemic"!!!

PODCAST: The History of Christmas in America

David Weinberger /  / 

Be sure to listen to Matt Spalding discuss the history and importance of Christmas in America. Tune in here!
How did early Americans celebrate Christmas? Since Christmas is also a time of giving, what are traditional ways Americans have done so? Is there a particular story about Christmas from the founding or other times in America that is relevant today?

Be sure to tune in to hear Spalding answer these questions and more!

Mensaje de Navidad desde el FBI

Navidad en familia
Reproducimos en su totalidad el mensaje personal que el director del FBI, James Comey, envió el 16 de diciembre a todo su personal. Vale la pena leerlo en estas fechas tan especiales y con la amenaza del terrorismo preocupando a más de uno.

Durante una época del año que por lo general está llena de buen humor, el pueblo americano está sintiendo bastante ansiedad. Ya que creo que con razón el pueblo ve al FBI como una fuerza competente e independiente en la vida de nuestro país, he estado hablando en público más de lo que lo haría normalmente acerca de nuestro trabajo. Mi objetivo es explicar nuestro trabajo e insto a no dejar que el miedo se convierta en atenazante y que más bien lo canalicemos en algo saludable – a percatarnos de lo que nos rodea.
Cuando me convertí en director, cada uno de mis hijos recibió una copia del libro “El valor del miedo”, que enseña a canalizar el miedo instintivo y a percatarse del entorno. Mi familia se enteró de que hay cuatro posibles estados de existencia: Rojo (Uno está en una lucha por la vida); Naranja (Uno se prepara para luchar); Amarillo (Uno está muy consciente de su entorno); y Blanco (Uno tiene los audífonos puestos escuchando música y enviando mensajes de texto en una solitaria estación de metro a altas horas de la noche). Es imposible vivir la vida en un estado prolongado de color rojo o naranja debido a que el nivel de estrés nos destruiría. Más bien, la mayoría vive en estado blanco, moviéndose a través de estacionamientos o restaurantes sin percatarse de lo que está sucediendo a su alrededor. El amarillo es una vida en equilibrio – reconocer que el mal nos rodea, pero percatándonos de ello y no dejando que el miedo nos atenace.
Esta temporada festiva, Uds. tendrán muchas oportunidades de representar [al FBI] ante el pueblo americano en todo tipo de conversaciones. Amigos y parientes les preguntarán que está pasando y si deberían tener miedo. No deberían tener miedo. El Estado Islámico (EI) y otros grupos terroristas no representan una amenaza existencial para Estados Unidos; nuestro gran país es demasiado grande y demasiado bueno. En lugar de ello, los terroristas esperan matar, o inspirar a otros a matar, con el fin de inducir un miedo paralizante. Estos salvajes realmente creen que pueden dañar significativamente nuestro país y nuestra economía a través del miedo. No pueden y no lo harán.
La gente del FBI trabaja todos los días para encontrar y detener a los asesinos. Hemos detenido a muchos este año. Por desgracia, la naturaleza de la amenaza es tal que simplemente no lo podemos ver todo y no podemos detener todo. Debido a que los asesinos potenciales son difíciles de ver, dependemos de la gente y que nos digan cuando ven algo preocupante; dependemos de las personas que viven en amarillo, no en blanco.
Y parte de lograr enrolar esa ayuda tiene que ver con la confianza que nos hemos ganado –y que debemos mantener— con los americanos de toda condición. Siempre he creído que el perdurable poder de este país radica en el talento y el carácter de la gente a la que atraemos. Soy tan afortunado de que mis antepasados ​​vinieran aquí. Mucha gente en ese entonces no estaba muy contenta de tener irlandeses uniéndose a la familia americana, pero lo superaron y ese proceso hizo que Estados Unidos fuera mejor, al igual que sucedió con un sinnúmero de otros grupos. La conexión del FBI con todos los americanos es vital para nuestro éxito. Gracias por mantenerla.
Sea como fuere que Uds. decidan festejar esta época del año, espero que puedan sacar tiempo para apreciar a su familia y amigos, tomarse su bebida favorita y tal vez reír hasta quedarse sin aliento.  Uds. han estado trabajando muy, muy duro, haciendo enorme bien por todo el país y alrededor del mundo. Estados Unidos a menudo les pide que corran una maratón. Pero si vamos a seguir protegiéndolo tan bien, Uds deben tomarse un descanso del trabajo de vez en cuando.
En cuanto a mí, en esta Navidad mi familia por fin está viviendo junta en un solo sitio y eso es una gran alegría. Nuestra nueva casa en el área de Washington DC tiene puertas estrechas, pero estoy decidido de todos modos a meter un árbol de Navidad grande y grueso, a pesar del comprensible escepticismo de mi esposa. Tendré que pasar la aspiradora durante meses para recoger las agujas de pino. Pero valdrá totalmente la pena.
Feliz Navidad.
Jim Comey
© Traducido por Miryam Lindberg

© Libertad.org


How to Manufacture an Anti-Muslim Hate-Crime 'Epidemic'

By Michelle Malkin | December 23, 2015 | 6:14 AM EST
Step one: Find an expert with an impressive-sounding academic title to legitimize shoddy advocacy propaganda.
        
Meet Brian Levin. He's the one-man band behind something called the "Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism" at California State University, San Bernardino. The "center" (that is: Levin) claims to be "nonpartisan" and "objective." But he is a former top staffer of the militant, conservative-smearing Southern Poverty Law Center, which was forced to apologize earlier this year after including famed black neurosurgeon and GOP 2016 candidate Ben Carson on its "extremist watch list" of hate groups.
        
At SPLC, Levin infamously posited that the 2002 Beltway jihad snipers were Angry White Men, a fatal error echoed by politically correct law enforcement officials whose wild-goose chase needlessly cost lives. A decade later, the SPLC's target map and list of social conservative groups were used by convicted left-wing domestic terrorist Floyd Lee Corkins to shoot up the Washington, D.C., office of the Family Research Council.
        
The radical left-wing SPLC, whose annual "hate and extremism" report spawned Levin's sham "center," brazenly declared that its mission is to "destroy" its political opponents. Harper's Magazine writer Ken Silverstein called the SPLC and its work "essentially a fraud" that "shuts down debate, stifles free speech, and most of all, raises a pile of money, very little of which is used on behalf of poor people."
        
Step two: Enlist gullible, lazy, biased, and complicit journalists who recycle the "expert's" sweeping pronouncements as proven facts, backed up by other ideologically vested advocacy group spokespeople.
        
NBC News, The New York Times, the Daily Mail and Slate all quoted Levin over the past week hyping his new "study" (published in esteemed academic journal The Huffington Post) on an alleged "increase," "surge" and "spike" in "crimes against Muslims and mosques" this year.
        
Levin's "methods" of "analysis"? Stringing together "apparent hate crimes reported in the media and by civil rights groups across the United States." Most prominent among his sources: the Council on American-Islamic Relations, whose jihad-apologizing frontman Ibrahim Hooper was quoted by both NBC and The New York Times backing Levin's "research" (which were, of course, based on several of CAIR's grievance-grifting claims). Cozy, huh?
        
"We're seeing so many of these things happening that it's unbelievable," Hooper told the Times.
        
Indeed, it is.
        
In his list of "Suspected Hate Crimes Directed at Actual or Perceived Muslim Institutions or Individuals Since Paris Attacks," Levin cites a Nov. 26 incident in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, noting, "Cab driver shot. Attempted Murder."
        
The rest of the story: The suspect is 26-year-old Anthony Mohamed, whose father is Muslim. Authorities have so far refused to press hate crimes charges despite CAIR's demands. At a hearing this week, the cab driver denied in court that he had been subjected to negative comments about his religion before Mohamed allegedly shot him in the back. Court filings fail to mention any evidence of anti-Muslim bias in the case.
        
Or take a look at Levin's No. 23: "12/6 Buena Park, CA. Sikh Temple. Vandalism, Crim. Mischief." CAIR's Los Angeles office publicized vandalism at an Orange County Sikh temple, immediately condemning a "tiny minority of bigots who violate our nation's longstanding principles of religious tolerance and inclusion."
        
The rest of the story: Authorities arrested a local, 20-year-old Brodie Durazo, after he admitted spray-painting the temple, a tractor trailer and other property in the gang-infested neighborhood. "I have lived alongside this temple for many years of my life and have never once seen you as anything but a peaceful people," he told the temple-goers in a personal apology at the house of worship. "I just hope that you will see by my presence that all I want is for peace as well."
        
Not a menacing "bigot." Just a bored punk.
        
Or consider Levin's No. 33: "12/10 Tampa, FL. Rocks/shots at 2 Muslim drivers. Assault, Threat leaving relig. service in hijab."
        
Both women are unidentified. Their unvetted stories were immediately publicized by, you guessed it, CAIR. "Both incidents were investigated by Hillsborough County sheriff's deputies," according to local Florida media, "though investigators said neither case involved definitive proof of a hate crime." In one case, the sheriff's office spokeswoman said, "It could have been road rage or just a misunderstanding." In the second case involving alleged shots fired at a vehicle, investigators said the woman "was not sure where or when" a bullet hole found on the car was made.
        
Step three: Attack the messenger. After I published a lengthy post on my blog outlining an epidemic of Muslim hate-crime hoaxes at colleges, mosques and businesses dating back to 2001, Levin took to Twitter to accuse me of "smears." The facts, which the rest of the media failed to inform readers about while hyping Levin's work this week, speak for themselves (see michellemalkin.com).
        
Step four: Classify this article as "hate" and any media outlet that publishes it as a "hate group" so that other journalists shun the truth and continue perpetuating the hoax.

martes, 9 de diciembre de 2014

Death. Riots. Suffering. What is happening?...Pobreza = Desigualdad?...How will Facebook survive in a Communist country?

Featured Image
My heart is heavy wondering, “How do these communities and the rest of our nation find peace in the midst of so much angst?

Death. Riots. Suffering. Where is the peace on Earth this Christmas?

A woman I just met tells me her husband lost his job and she recently quit hers to stay home with her children. Their life is unsettled. How does she find peace?
A text came through late at night last week as a man shared that his daughter is going to lose her baby at 23 weeks. I wake in the morning to see pictures of her stillborn child. How does this family find peace in the pain of this loss?
I read a news announcement online: “Violence Flares in St. Louis Suburb After Grand Jury Declines to Indict Darren Wilson in Michael Brown’s Death.” I watch as the community in Ferguson, Missouri is divided and more tragedies begin to unfold as fallout of the decision.
A few days later, I see another online news announcement that read: “Grand Jury Declines to Indict NYPD Officer in Eric Garner Chokehold Death.” People are outraged by the news and many take to the streets in protest.
My heart is heavy wondering, “How do these communities and the rest of our nation find peace in the midst of so much angst?"
Christmas is approaching and I see signs saying “peace on earth.” I put one up in my own house. Peace. How does the heart find peace?
Last night, as I met with the adult leaders in the girls’ program I direct, Lesley who is in her early 20’s shared with me details from her service trip to Peru. Lesley has a condition called alopecia, which caused her to lose all her hair many years ago. And, in this culture where she constantly hears messages of the importance of looks, she has found confidence and comfort in who she is and who God created her to be.
She went to Peru without her wig. People stared and pointed, and because she did not speak the language, she could not tell people about why she is bald. She felt a slight discomfort in their looks, but she wasn’t there to defend her appearance; she was there to serve.  She surrendered her desires and dug deeper to humble herself in pure sacrifice for the people she was tending to. 
Follow Melanie on Facebook 
Lesley told me not only about the physical poverty of the people she encountered, but she also their spiritual poverty. “It was difficult and even uncomfortable being in a place so far from home knowing there was so much that needed to be done to help these people, but there was so little time,” she said. Then she shared a sentence that struck me. “I had to find peace in the discomfort.” She added, “I wasn’t there to solve these people’s problems, I had no control over that.” She went on to quote Mother Teresa, “God does not require that we be successful only that we be faithful.” She adds, “I tried to be faithful and pushed back my inclination to be successful.”
How do we find peace in a world that seems at times peace-less? We recognize, like Lesley, what we can do and what we cannot. We surrender control. And, as the old-age-serenity-prayer goes, we pray, “God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.”
We can find peace in faithfulness to the Lord. We can find peace in He who is peace. Peace who was found in the uncomfortable setting of a manger where he was laid in a trough where animals were usually fed. We can find peace in the discomfort. We can find peace when we love as He loved; when we trust as He trusted; when we sacrifice as He sacrificed.
Saint John Paul II once said, “Man cannot fully find himself, except through a sincere gift of himself.” Maybe we find peace not in fixing every problem we see or shooting for success in everything we do, but in simply offering ourselves as a sincere gift to others.
Image
Recently the picture above became, as many are calling it, an “Icon of Hope.” Twelve-year-old Devonte Hart, an African-American boy, held up a sign that read “Free Hugs” during a Ferguson-related rally in Portland, Oregon. A white police officer took Hart up on his offer and the picture captured this tender moment of the two hugging and tears running down Hart’s face.
Devonte Hart made a sincere gift of himself in that moment when he decided to create a sign that read “Free Hugs.” He gave the gift of himself and offered peace in the discomfort. Hart can’t fix the enormous problems happening in this country, but he did bring something big right into the heart of that storm. He brought peace. And, because it was photographed, he has now brought that peace, courage, strength, and hope to many who were feeling discouraged.
If we could all be more like Devonte Hart. If we could all surrender our desire to fix, solve and be successful and replace it with a willingness to be faithful and find peace and bring peace in even the most uncomfortable places. May each of us, as Christmas approaches, not think about the presents we will get or the toys and trinkets we will give, but see our own potential as gift. May we become gift as Christ himself was to all and give the sincerity of ourselves to those who least expect it. It is there we will find peace.
 Original Wayuu Bags

Pobreza y desigualdad

OxfamOxfam es un buen ejemplo de pensamiento único, porque combina un análisis superficial con una fuerte carga moralizante. Véase este párrafo de un reciente informe:
La fortuna de las 85 personas más ricas del mundo es equivalente a la de la mitad más pobre del planeta. La brecha entre ricos y pobres se ha disparado estos últimos años. Es una amenaza para reducir la pobreza pero también para construir sociedades más cohesionadas, democráticas y justas. Es hora de cambiar unas reglas del juego que ahora están diseñadas a favor de unos pocos. Es hora de que hablemos de desigualdad.
La principal deficiencia analítica es la sugerencia de que desigualdad y pobreza están relacionadas. No se trata sólo de que hay personas muy ricas sino que su riqueza es comparada con la de quienes no son acaudalados, como si ambos fenómenos estuviesen relacionados, cuando no tienen por qué guardar entre sí vinculación alguna, salvo que se demuestre realmente lo que este párrafo sugiere, es decir: que los ricos son tan ricos porque los pobres son tantos y tan pobres.
Dirá usted: qué disparate de planteamiento. Pero es lo que dice Oxfam para cualquiera que lea: se trata de una “brecha”, que “amenaza” la reducción de la pobreza, y nada menos que la democracia y la justicia. Se trata de unas “reglas” pensadas para “unos pocos”. Nada de esto se sostiene, pero se repite sin cesar, igual que sin cesar las jeremiadas contra la desigualdad excluyen la enorme desigualdad que en el último siglo se ha abierto entre la riqueza del Estado y la de sus súbditos.
No abundaré hoy en el informe de Oxfam, ya criticado por Juan Ramón Rallo en Voz Pópuli (puede verse también su análisis sobre el informe de Cáritas en Libertad Digital). Pero me interesa subrayar una de las fuerzas más importantes del pensamiento único: su impacto en el periodismo. La combinación de análisis insuficiente y ostentación moralizante puede tener efectos devastadores si los periodistas que lo recogen carecen de espíritu crítico y, como suele suceder con Oxfam, están dispuestos a aceptar como verdad revelada todas sus argumentaciones.
El modo en el que el diario español El Periódico se hizo eco de dicho informe es ilustrativo de esa actitud acrítica y ditirámbica. Con una llamada en portada que denuncia “España, fábrica de desigualdad”, que ya nos invita a pensar en una siniestra conspiración de algunos que se dedican realmente a fabricar esa cosa tan mala, Agustí Sala llena dos páginas del diario con gran entusiasmo y ni un solo matiz ni cuestionamiento. Los ricos, así, no sólo tienen riqueza sino que la acaparan. El lector sólo puede concluir que es imprescindible una intervención pública mayor para redistribuir y luchar contra la desigualdad. Y todo para bien, sólo para bien en todos los sentidos:
El informe destaca que la desigualdad no es un mal necesario para el progreso, como se sostiene desde algunos ámbitos, sino una traba.
Ni un matiz sobre la lógica aparentemente impecable que fuerza la conclusión de que es imprescindible subir los impuestos. No puede haber objeción alguna, y menos cuando dicha conclusión viene avalada por el peso de la moral. Después de todo, queda claro, como señala un recuadro, que los datos de Oxfam no sólo son indiscutiblemente “ciertos” sino además “lacerantes”.

ZUCKERBERG LAUDS SOCIALISM WITH CHINA’S INTERNET CENSORSHIP CZAR

Facebook CEO's visit with Lu Wei "hypocritical and absurd"
Zuckerberg Lauds Socialism With China's Internet Censorship Czar
by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON DECEMBER 9, 2014

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg lauded the virtues of socialism during a recent meeting with Lu Wei, the czar of China’s draconian Internet censorship system.
Having previously met with State Department official Catherine Novelli, who urged the two countries to “work together as friends” on web security, Wei paid a visit to Facebook’s SIlicon Valley offices despite the fact that the social networking website is completely banned in China.
During the meeting, Wei discovered a book written by Chinese President Xi Jinping called “The Governance of China” sitting on Zuckerberg’s office desk, leading Zuckerberg to comment, “I’ve bought this book for my co-workers. I want them to understand socialism with Chinese characteristics.”
“The sight of Xi’s book on a tech tycoon’s table has been taken as hypocritical and absurd by many observers – the government Xi leads has one of the most restrictive Internet policies in the entire world and Facebook itself is banned in the country. Zuckerberg’s promoting of the book struck many as kow-towing,” reports the Washington Post.
Prominent Chinese dissident Hu Jia accused Zuckerberg of having an understanding of Chinese politics akin to a 3-year-old, while users of China’s social media site Weibo portrayed the Facebook CEO as a Mao-era Red Guard clutching Xi’s book.
Given that Facebook is the second biggest website in the world after Google, the fact that Zuckerberg is palling around with the head of a formidable censorship program that routinely silences and intimidates government critics is disconcerting to say the least, especially amidst efforts by the Obama administration, which has received Facebook support in the past, to reclassify the web as a utility, bringing it under Title II of the Telecommunications Act and greasing the skids for FCC control.
Under Wei’s control, blocks on foreign websites in China have increased, while regulations on social media were tightened to make web users who posted content critical of the state legally responsible for any content which receives over 500 shares should it be deemed a “false rumor” by authorities.
Those who flouted Wei’s order to keep posts about government conduct “positive” had their accounts shut down and some were even detained by police.
China routinely censors the Internet and cuts off access in order to hide evidence of government corruption and to cover up atrocities committed by the state, a process that Wei has personally overseen since 2011.