Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta mexico. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta mexico. Mostrar todas las entradas

miércoles, 19 de noviembre de 2014

Population Control : Sterilization Factory!...en Mexico será que todo es Corrupto?...to too many the Government gives us Rights...do they?

Featured Image
ChameleonsEye / Shutterstock.com
Population Research Institute

A sterilization story the population controllers do NOT want you to read

You’re about to read the story of eleven million women and men who were forcibly sterilized in India. And be forewarned: This is very unpleasant reading!

Entire villages rounded up

In the Indian village of Uttawar, for instance, residents were roused from their sleep by loudspeakers and ordered to gather on the main road. There, police forcibly seized all males age 15 and over and herded them to sterilization centers.
The horror that happened in the village of Uttawar is just one example of how population controllers inflicted forced sterilization. When the forced mutilations were over, eleven million men and women had been sterilized against their will.

Assembly line sterilization

Image
These millions of men and women were forcibly sterilized in conditions that were appallingly unsanitary. No follow-up care was offered. Many died from subsequent infections. 1,800 families filed wrongful death suits, but that number is thought to merely scratch the surface of the number of deaths inflicted as a result of forced, unhygenic sterilization.

Are you asking yourself these two questions? . . .

“Forced sterilization in India was a one-time tragedy, wasn’t it? It couldn’t happen again, could it?”
Wrong! Forced sterilization has happened again since this nightmare in India. It’s happened in Peru . . . Vietnam . . . and Indonesia. And it’s happening right now – on a truly massive scale – in China!
In fact, India’s coercive system of sterilization quotas and targets creates a climate ripe for human rights abuses in what amounts to mass sterilization camps. Just this November, Chhattisgarh, India, saw their own version of these abuses as 15 women died in one such mass sterilization camp under what appears to be the pressure of government quotas.
With officials seemingly obsessed with population control, health and sanitation take a secondary role to the priority of meeting sterilization targets. This abuse of power cannot go on.
Reprinted with permission from Population Research Institute.
 Original Wayuu Bags

Corrupción: En México lo ha podrido todo

MéxicoEl terrible episodio de los 43 estudiantes de la Escuela Normal de Ayotzinapa, asesinados por narcotraficantes, supuestamente comisionados por la Policía para cometer ese crimen, demuestra que México exhibe el síntoma más grave de los Estados fallidos: la pérdida casi total del principio de autoridad.
Las repúblicas surgidas a fines del siglo XVIII –con Estados Unidos a la cabeza–, seguidas en el XIX por las repúblicas latinoamericanas, fueron organizadas en torno a tres principios esenciales:
  1. Todos los ciudadanos están sujetos al imperio de la ley y la ley no puede hacer distinciones.
  2. Ningún crimen juzgado y condenado debe quedar impune.
  3. El Estado, porque así lo estipula la ley, se reserva el monopolio de la violencia y la coacción, por usar un concepto creado por el sociólogo alemán Max Weber.
Eso quiere decir que nadie puede, por su cuenta y riesgo, maltratar, castigar ni, mucho menos, matar a otra persona. Esas ingratas tareas nada más puede realizarlas el Estado, y sólo y siempre de acuerdo con leyes previamente aprobadas e inscritas en códigos específicos.
En México, y en muchos países latinoamericanos, esos tres principios fundamentales que sostienen la República han sido sistemáticamente pulverizados.
En México, desde hace muchas décadas, la cúpula dirigente violó todas las leyes, casi siempre para enriquecerse, y ese comportamiento fue permeando todos los estamentos del Estado hasta generar una atmósfera de corrupción casi total.
Quien tenía un cargo lo utilizaba para cobrar comisiones por todo, allí llamadas mordidas. Y quienes no tenían cargos colaboraban con la corrupción pagando dócilmente esas mordidas, por ejemplo a la Policía que se ocupaba del tráfico.
Una vez que el narcotráfico se convirtió en una gigantesca operación económica, con bandas armadas que se disputaban los territorios para vender las drogas, resultó natural que quienes desde el Estado cometían otros delitos se hicieran cómplices de los cárteles para ganar más dinero. Los funcionarios corruptos brindaban protección a los narcos y los narcos daban dinero o prestaban servicios a los funcionarios corruptos.
El asesinato de los 43 estudiantes es una muestra de esa relación perversa. Los estudiantes molestaban a los funcionarios corruptos, en este caso miembros del PRD, y los narcos los ejecutaron y luego incineraron los cadáveres, como ocurre en el mundo de las pandillas.
 ¿Qué se puede hacer? No es nada sencillo. Hay que volver a los principios: todos tienen que colocarse bajo el imperio de la ley, no puede haber impunidad ante el delito y el Estado debe recuperar el monopolio de la violencia y la coacción.
Fácil de decir y difícil de llevar a cabo; pero o lo intentan o en algún punto la República será devorada por alguna aventura autoritaria. Se desplomará. 

School Handout: 'The Government Gives Us Rights'

"[G]ive your loyalty to the U.S. government."

     
9
A well-circulated school handout is teaching children that rights are given to citizens not by their Creator, but by their government.
The author of the handout, Phyllis Naegeli, writes educational (used loosely) materials for elementary school-aged children. Her lesson Being a Good Citizen, found onEdHelper.com, states the following:
When you are a citizen you have rights. Rights are special privileges the government gives you. In our country, you have free speech. You are also given the right to choose a religion.
Because the government gives us rights, we have the duty to be good citizens.
The writing, which dates back to at least 2009, caused much controversy then, so much so that Naegeli came to her own defense in a concerned forum group discussion that year. Here's what she said:
From what I have discovered an article I wrote for edhelper.com because [sic] quite a point of controversy on your forum the other day. I am being accused of spreading left-wing propaganda, being a Pelosi relative, and other such incorrect titles. I am a Christian and I own up to mistakes that I make. I made a mistake in these articles by saying the government gives us rights. The government is to protect the rights we are given by God. For that I apologize and ask for forgiveness. I am far from being left wing. I chose the incorrect words to try to simply describe what being a citizen is. I never intended for anyone to be offended by this or to spread some incorrect information to children. I home educated all of my children and have been very careful about what they were taught. I have taught them to be loyal citizens of our wonderful country.
Naegeli asked EdHelper.com to revise her writing to say the following:
As a citizen you have special privileges called rights. The government protects those rights. In our country, you have free speech. You are also given the right to choose a religion.
Because the government protects our rights, we have the duty to be good citizens.
Naegeli states that she no longer writes for the teachers' resource website and does not own the writing she produced for them. She advises anyone who takes issue with her work to contact them directly to request changes.
But it may be too late because the damage has been done. Despite the revisions, the original work is still being distributed. Fast forward five years to November 2014 -- Andrew Washburn posts a picture to Facebook of Naegeli's original Being A Good Citizen given to his 8-year-old daughter at school. Washburn sarcastically writes, "I just feel so grateful to live in a country whose leaders have generously granted my rights, and even more grateful that they make sure my children know where those rights came from!"
There are also other lessons written by Naegeli that can be found online. One is titled Our Living Constitution in which she writes, "Our Constitution is alive! That's because it can be changed."
Another is United States Citizenship where she states, "As a citizen, you give your loyalty to the U.S. government."

viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013

Corporate Executives cashing out from Wall street? ... Mexico, serán posibles reformas profundas? ... How many rights have Americans lost?

The Big Dogs On Wall Street Are Starting To Get Very Nervous

Michael Snyder

Economic Collapse
Feb 22, 2013

Why are some of the biggest names in the corporate world unloading stock like there is no tomorrow, and why are some of the most prominent investors on Wall Street loudly warning about the possibility of a market crash?  Should we be alarmed that the big dogs on Wall Street are starting to get very nervous?  In aprevious article, I got very excited about a report that indicated that corporate insiders were selling nine times more of their own shares than they were buying.  Well, according to a brand new Bloomberg article, insider sales of stock have outnumbered insider purchases of stock by a ratio of twelve to one over the past three months.  That is highly unusual.  And right now some of the most respected investors in the financial world are ringing the alarm bells.  Dennis Gartman says that it is time to “rush to the sidelines”, Seth Klarman is warning about “the un-abating risks of collapse”, and Doug Kass is proclaiming that “we’re headed for a sharp fall”.  So does all of this mean that a market crash is definitely on the way?  No, but when you combine all of this with the weak economic data constantly coming out of the U.S. and Europe, it certainly does not paint a pretty picture.
According to Bloomberg, it has been two years since we have seen insider sales of stock at this level.  And when insider sales of stock are this high, that usually means that the market is about to decline…
Corporate executives are taking advantage of near-record U.S. stock prices by selling shares in their companies at the fastest pace in two years.
There were about 12 stock-sale announcements over the past three months for every purchase by insiders at Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) companies, the highest ratio since January 2011, according to data compiled by Bloomberg and Pavilion Global Markets. Whenever the ratio exceeded 11 in the past, the benchmark index declined 5.9 percent on average in the next six months, according to Pavilion, a Montreal-based trading firm.


But it isn’t just the number of stock sales that is alarming.  Some of these insider transactions are absolutely huge.  Just check out these numbers
Among the biggest transactions last week were a $65.2 million sale by Google Inc.’s 39-year-old Chief Executive Officer Larry Page, a $40.1 million disposal by News Corp.’s 81- year-old Chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch and a $34.2 million sale from American Express Co. chief Kenneth Chenault, who is 61. Nolan Archibald, the 69-year-old chairman of Stanley Black & Decker Inc. who plans to leave his post next month, unloaded $29.7 million in shares last week and Amphenol Corp. Chairman Martin Hans Loeffler, 68, sold $27.5 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Google Chairman Eric Schmidt, 57, announced plans to sell as many as 3.2 million shares in the operator of the world’s most-popular search engine. The planned share sales, worth about $2.5 billion, represent about 42 percent of Schmidt’s holdings.
So why are all of these very prominent executives cashing out all of a sudden? CONTINUE READING

México: Camino de convertirse en el “tigre azteca”


El presidente mexicano Enrique Peña Nieto, recién instalado en el cargo, está buscando la forma de renovar la economía de México y una de las herramientas que ya ha buscado es la puesta en marcha de una reforma laboral.

Se trata de una medida esperada desde hace mucho tiempo. Según el Índice 2013 de Libertad Económica, publicado por la Fundación Heritage y el Wall Street Journal, México se sitúa por debajo del promedio mundial en lo que respecta a libertad laboral, pues los poderosos intereses particulares que existen en México han hecho que las firmes reformas anteriores resultaran insuficientes e ineficaces.
Como se observa en el Índice, una legislación laboral inflexible hace difícil que los empleadores prescindan de los empleados que, por las razones que sean, no están sobresaliendo en su trabajo. El resultado: una menor productividad y unos márgenes de beneficios demasiado reducidos como para que las empresas se mantengan en pie en los momentos difíciles.

El sindicato de profesores de México (el mayor de Latinoamérica, con cerca de 650,000 miembros) nos brinda un ejemplo de cómo unos arraigados intereses particulares dan como resultado dichas ineficiencias. El sindicato promociona a los profesores según su lealtad y antigüedad, no por sus méritos. La legislación laboral mexicana tampoco hace que los educadores tengan que rendir cuentas por la calidad de su enseñanza. Al final, estas normativas sólo perjudican a los estudiantes a los que los educadores dicen que están tratando de ayudar.

NECESITA ASISTENCIA TEMPORAL? AET del Banco Social...$500 YA


Peña Nieto ya ha convencido a los líderes de su partido político (el Partido Revolucionario Institucional, históricamente el partido político “pro-sindicatos” de México) para que apruebe una ley que restrinja el poder sindical dentro del sistema educativo y que promocione a los profesores según sus méritos. Reformas estructurales como estas son las que se necesitan para transformar la lenta economía mexicana en el “tigre azteca” que están previendo muchos economistas.

A medida que los beneficios de las nuevas reformas laborales se empiecen a reflejar en el desempeño económico de México, el país se encontrará en una posición excelente para “saltar” sobre sus competidores globales. Su proximidad a Estados Unidos y la participación en numerosos acuerdos de libre comercio deberían permitir que México se convierta en un centro industrial global de primer orden en los próximos cinco años.

Peña Nieto tiene un largo y duro camino por delante, pero sus reformas podrían posicionar a su país como una economía de mercado emergente aún más fuerte y en el camino hacia una prosperidad y una libertad económica mayores.

Scorecard: How Many Rights Have Americans REALLY Lost?


Washington’s Blog
Feb 22, 2013

Preface: While a lot of people talk about the loss of our Constitutional liberties, people usually speak in a vague, generalized manner … or focus on only one issue and ignore the rest.
This post explains the liberties guaranteed in the Bill of Rights – the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution – and provides a scorecard on the extent of the loss of each right.

First Amendment

The 1st Amendment protects speech, religion, assembly and the press:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
However, the government is arresting those speaking out … and violently crushing peaceful assemblies which attempt to petition the government for redress.

A federal judge found that the law allowing indefinite detention of Americans without due process has a“chilling effect” on free speech. And see this and this.

The threat of being labeled a terrorist for exercising our First Amendment rights certainly violates the First Amendment.   The government is using laws to crush dissent, and it’s gotten so bad that even U.S. Supreme Court justices are saying that we are descending into tyranny.



For example, the following actions may get an American citizen living on U.S. soil labeled as a “suspected terrorist” today:
And holding the following beliefs may also be considered grounds for suspected terrorism:
Of course, Muslims are more or less subject to a separate system of justice in America. READ MORE